Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery
- PMID: 15865024
- DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27449-9_11
Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery
Abstract
The individual surgeon is an independent prognostic factor for outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. The surgeon's learning curve is therefore directly related to the patient's outcome. The exact shape of the learning curve, however, is unknown. The present study reviewed supervision, training/teaching, specialization, surgeon's caseload, and hospital's caseload as the five main surgeon- and hospital-related confounding factors for outcome, and examined their influence on the learning curve as well as their interactions and prognostic significance. All five confounding factors were related to outcome. The highest degree of evidence, however, was found for training/teaching (introduction of total mesorectal excision), specialization in colorectal surgery (special interest, board-certification, specialized colorectal cancer units), and the surgeon's caseload. Five surgeon- and hospital-related factors directly influence the surgeon's learning curve and are therefore rightly considered predictors of outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. Improvements in supervision, training/teaching, specialization, the surgeon's caseload, and the hospital's caseload will therefore translate into enhanced patient outcome.
Similar articles
-
The influence of the surgeon's and the hospital's caseload on survival and local recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery.Surgery. 2006 Mar;139(3):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.023. Surgery. 2006. PMID: 16546492
-
Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome.Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jan;9(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01095.x. Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17181844 Review.
-
Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome.Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jan;9(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01100.x. Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17181843 Review.
-
Surgeon case volume and 5 years survival rate for colorectal cancer.Ann Ital Chir. 2021;92:654-659. Ann Ital Chir. 2021. PMID: 35166217
-
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 22459726
Cited by
-
Surgical Unit volume and 30-day reoperation rate following primary resection for colorectal cancer in the Veneto Region (Italy).Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jan;20(1):31-40. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1388-0. Epub 2015 Nov 16. Tech Coloproctol. 2016. PMID: 26573812
-
Challenges and Learning Curves in Adopting TaTME and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cusum Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;14(20):5089. doi: 10.3390/cancers14205089. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36291872 Free PMC article.
-
Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug 4;27(3):e536-e546. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761170. eCollection 2023 Jul. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 37564472 Free PMC article.
-
Urethral Injury in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Study Using Cadaveric Dissection, Imaging Analyses, and Clinical Series.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;15(20):4955. doi: 10.3390/cancers15204955. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37894322 Free PMC article.
-
RODENT STROKE MODEL GUIDELINES FOR PRECLINICAL STROKE TRIALS (1ST EDITION).J Exp Stroke Transl Med. 2009 Jan 1;2(2):2-27. doi: 10.6030/1939-067x-2.2.2. J Exp Stroke Transl Med. 2009. PMID: 20369026 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical