Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005;10(2):309-17.

Open, randomized, multicentre italian trial on PEG-IFN plus ribavirin versus PEG-IFN monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected patients on HAART

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15865225
Clinical Trial

Open, randomized, multicentre italian trial on PEG-IFN plus ribavirin versus PEG-IFN monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected patients on HAART

Antonietta Cargnel et al. Antivir Ther. 2005.

Abstract

Background: Chronic hepatitis C is common and aggressive in HIV-positive patients, so the development of a well-tolerated HCV therapy is a priority. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alpha2b (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) versus PEG-IFN monotherapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and analysed the predictive factors of response.

Methods: An Italian, multicentre, open-label trial including 135 coinfected patients, randomized to PEG-IFN 1.5 microg/kg/week plus RBV 400 mg twice daily (n=69, arm A) or PEG-IFN 1.5 microg/kg/week (n=66, arm B) for 48 weeks. We assessed the predictive values of early virological response (EVR) at week 8 (HCV-RNA drop >2 log10 compared with baseline or undetectable levels) on sustained virological response (SVR).

Results: Fifty-five patients (28 from arm A and 27 from arm B) completed 48 weeks of therapy. At the end of treatment, 20/28 patients in arm A and 11/27 in arm B had HCV-RNA <50 IU/ml. In a per-protocol analysis, SVR was reached by 54% of patients in arm A (genotype 2-3, 11/16; genotype 1-4, 4/12) and 22% in arm B (genotype 2-3, 3/15; genotype 1-4, 3/12). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR was 22% in arm A (genotype 2-3, 11/32; genotype 1-4, 4/37) versus 9% in arm B (genotype 2-3, 3/32; genotype 1-4, 3/34). The best predictors of SVR were the use of combination therapy, infection with HCV genotype 3 versus genotype 1, and EVR at week 8. Thirty patients (15 from arm A and 15 from arm B) dropped out of the trial prematurely due to side effects. The positive predictive value of EVR at week 8 was 65%, the negative predictive value was 86%.

Conclusions: PEG-IFN plus RBV can be considered a solid option for the treatment of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The key to successfully improving efficacy is strong compliance through strict overall patient monitoring, in order to best manage drug toxicity. EVR assessment at week 8 may become a useful stategy in the management of therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources