Cost considerations and applicant characteristics for the Pediatric Surgery Match

Abstract

Background/purpose: Formal training in pediatric surgery is highly competitive. The limited number of accredited positions has historically favored applicants with basic science experience, numerous publications, national presentations, and exposure to well-known pediatric surgeons. This review analyzes characteristics of successful applicants and cost associated with the Match.

Methods: A survey was e-mailed to 45 applicants after the 2003 Match. Geographic provenance, demographics, qualifications, costs, and valued program characteristics were assessed. Statistics were formulated by chi2 and Student's t test.

Results: Thirty-six applicants (80%) responded. Successful characteristics for matched vs unmatched included number of publications, 11.2 vs 5.7 (P < .01); first-author designation, 6.4 vs 3.1 (P = .02); basic science papers, 5.7 vs 1.7 (P < .01); national presentations, 5.8 vs 2.4 (P = .02); and presentations at pediatric surgical meetings, 2.0 vs 0.6 (P = .04). Ninety percent of matched applicants took time off to perform basic science research (P < .01). Average candidate expense was $6974, which represented 14% of pretax salary. Forty-one percent of applicants noted that cost limited the number of interviews taken. Fifty percent preferred a regional interview process to limit expense. Candidates ranked case diversity, volume, and mentor's advice as the most valued program characteristics. Successful applicants matched at their fifth rank on average. Eighty-six percent of unsuccessful applicants will reapply.

Conclusions: Results of this study are important to those interested in the future of pediatric surgery. Successful applicants were shown to have several national presentations and multiple scientific publications, especially in basic sciences. Applicant costs are high, totaling more than $236,000 for survey respondents.