Losartan renography for the detection of renal artery stenosis: comparison with captopril renography and evaluation of dose and timing
- PMID: 15875180
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-1789-9
Losartan renography for the detection of renal artery stenosis: comparison with captopril renography and evaluation of dose and timing
Abstract
Purpose: Radionuclide renography with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition plays an important role in the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis. Angiotensin receptor antagonists inhibit the renin angiotensin system at different levels from ACE inhibitors by selectively blocking the binding of angiotensin II to AT1 receptors. The AT1 angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan has recently been used clinically in the treatment of hypertension. However, the available data on the use of losartan with renography for the detection of renovascular hypertension are limited and contradictory. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the effectiveness of losartan renography and captopril scintigraphy in revealing renal artery stenosis.
Methods: A total of 61 renal units in 32 patients with hypertension were studied in two groups based on the losartan dosage (50 mg in group A and 100 mg in group B). Group A consisted of 17 patients, in whom 19 renal units had angiographically proven renal artery stenosis (>or=50%). In group B, there were 15 patients, in whom 20 renal arteries were stenotic. All of the patients underwent three renographies (baseline, captopril renography and early losartan renography). Early losartan renography was performed at 1 h after oral losartan administration in both groups. In group B, seven patients underwent additional losartan renography (late losartan) performed 3 h after oral losartan administration; these patients composed group B1.
Results: The sensitivities of captopril and losartan studies were 63.2% and 42% in group A, 65% and 65% in group B and 55.6% and 66.6% in group B1, respectively.
Conclusion: From our preliminary results, we conclude that losartan is not superior to captopril renography for the detection of haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis. However, a high dose (100 mg) of losartan provided higher sensitivity than the lower dose (50 mg). Late losartan scintigraphy provided similar diagnostic efficacy to early losartan renography.
Similar articles
-
ACE inhibition is superior to angiotensin receptor blockade for renography in renal artery stenosis.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Mar;29(3):312-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-001-0707-z. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002. PMID: 12002704 Clinical Trial.
-
Can exercise renography be an alternative to ACE inhibitor renography in hypertensive patients who are suspicious for renal artery stenosis?Clin Nucl Med. 2004 Jan;29(1):27-34. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000103034.98198.26. Clin Nucl Med. 2004. PMID: 14688594 Clinical Trial.
-
Reliability of captopril renography in patients under chronic therapy with angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonists.J Nucl Med. 2003 Oct;44(10):1574-81. J Nucl Med. 2003. PMID: 14530469
-
[Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor renography. Physiopathological, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in renal artery stenosis].Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Feb 14;156(7):948-54, 957. Ugeskr Laeger. 1994. PMID: 8009737 Review. Danish.
-
Renal physiology of renal artery stenosis. Implications for captopril-stimulated renography.Am J Hypertens. 1991 Dec;4(12 Pt 2):669S-674S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/4.12.669s. Am J Hypertens. 1991. PMID: 1777181 Review.
Cited by
-
Atherosclerotic renovascular disease.Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):623-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70286-0. Can J Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16755319 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous