Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May-Jun;16(3):203-9; discussion 209.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1243-8. Epub 2004 Oct 23.

Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study

Affiliations

Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study

Jasmine S Tan et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 May-Jun.

Abstract

We sought to describe the relationship between patient symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and report the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of these POP symptoms. Two urologists and four urogynecologists developed a standardized pelvic floor questionnaire based on face validation for use at three female pelvic floor disorder clinics. Specific questions related to prolapse included questions on urinary splinting, digital assistance for defecation, and a bulge per vagina. Prolapse was assessed with the standardized Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative (POP-Q) terminology. The analysis included 1912 women. Urinary splinting was uncommon (< 10%) when Ba < 0, but ranged between 23 and 36% for stage III and IV Ba prolapse. Digital assistance was equally common in stage II Bp prolapse (21-38%) and stage III-IV Bp prolapse (26-29%). Only 6-11% of women with stage 0 or I POP reported symptoms of bulge, but with stage II it increased to 77%. Urinary splinting is 97% specific for anterior prolapse. The report of a bulge has an 81% positive predictive value and a 76% negative predictive value. Very few patients without anterior prolapse will report urinary splinting. Digital assistance for fecal evacuation is no more common with massive posterior prolapse than with moderate posterior prolapse. Patient report of a bulge is a valuable screening tool for POP and should prompt a careful exam.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):76-80 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2002 May 25;324(7348):1258-62 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;179(6 Pt 1):1446-9; discussion 1449-50 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 1994 Oct;3(5):291-306 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources