Polyomavirus nephropathy after renal transplantation: a single centre experience
- PMID: 15877682
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00393.x
Polyomavirus nephropathy after renal transplantation: a single centre experience
Abstract
Background: Polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PVN) in renal transplant recipients has been observed with increasing frequency recently and has emerged as a cause of allograft failure linked to highly potent new immunosuppressive regimens containing tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
Methods: Polyomavirus associated nephropathy was identified in nine out of 182 patients who received renal transplantation between October 1998 and July 2003. PVN was confirmed by allograft biopsy. The clinical records of these nine patients were reviewed, as were all of the allograft biopsies. Electron microscopy was performed in all nine cases. After the diagnosis of PVN, maintenance immunosuppression was reduced. The clinical course and outcome of the PVN patients were reviewed in relation to manipulation of immunosuppressive agents.
Results: There were nine cases of PVN in renal transplant recipients and the incidence of PVN was 4.9%. All patients with PVN were under triple immunosuppression comprising tacrolimus and MMF. The mean time to a diagnosis of PVN was 7.8 months after transplantation. Three of the nine patients received antirejection therapy prior to PVN. Seven out of nine PVN patients presenting acute allograft dysfunction were initially treated with high-dose intravenous steroid pulse or OKT3 before reduction of the immunosuppression. After reduction of the immunosuppression, seven patients stabilized their renal function. Two (22%) lost their grafts due to persistent PVN and chronic rejection. Two (22%) patients later developed acute rejection after reduction of the immunosuppression.
Conclusion: PVN can cause allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Renal allograft recipients who are at risk of PVN should be routinely screened with urine cytology and quantitative measurements of viral load in the blood, particularly patients who had graft dysfunction. Early diagnosis and judicious alteration of immunosuppressive agents might permit a superior prognosis and reduce the graft loss from PVN in renal transplant recipients.
Similar articles
-
BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 2004 Sep;36(7):2113-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.007. Transplant Proc. 2004. PMID: 15518765
-
BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients in Kuwait: a preliminary report.Transplant Proc. 2005 Sep;37(7):3048-50. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.018. Transplant Proc. 2005. PMID: 16213300
-
Low prevalence of BK virus nephropathy on nonprotocol renal biopsies in Iranian kidney transplant recipients: one center's experience and review of the literature.Exp Clin Transplant. 2010 Dec;8(4):297-302. Exp Clin Transplant. 2010. PMID: 21143095 Review.
-
Testing for polyomavirus type BK DNA in plasma to identify renal-allograft recipients with viral nephropathy.N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1309-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421802. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10793163
-
[Polyomavirus BK nephropathy in renal transplant: 2 cases with different clinical expressions and review of the literature].G Ital Nefrol. 2003 Jan-Feb;20(1):38-42. G Ital Nefrol. 2003. PMID: 12647285 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Risk factors for polyoma virus nephropathy.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Mar;24(3):1024-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn671. Epub 2008 Dec 10. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19073658 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical