Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 May;81(955):321-6.
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.022947.

Management of chronic heart failure: perceived needs of general practitioners in light of the new general medical services contract

Affiliations
Review

Management of chronic heart failure: perceived needs of general practitioners in light of the new general medical services contract

S J Leslie et al. Postgrad Med J. 2005 May.

Abstract

Background: Despite the existence of several chronic heart failure (CHF) guidelines the treatment of patients with CHF is suboptimal. The new general medical services (GMS) contract in primary care has only three specific performance indicators for patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this current questionnaire survey was to assess the views of general practitioners (GPs) on CHF treatments and services in light of the new GMS contract.

Methods and results: All local GPs (717) were sent a questionnaire. Fifty three per cent were returned. Forty five per cent of GPs had access to a community CHF nurse. Having read a national guideline (SIGN) and having the support of a CHF nurse did not seem to affect the knowledge of GPs in terms of perceived benefits of drug treatments. GPs with access to a specialist CHF nurse service attached more importance to it than those with no specialist nurse (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Most GPs were aware of the existence of a national guideline but many had not read it. There was little or no difference in the knowledge level for various evidence based treatments between GPs who had or had not read the guideline suggesting that reading guidelines may not be a key factor in determining knowledge. Support for a specialist CHF nurse was higher among GPs who already had this service, suggesting that this service is valued. The new GMS contract may improve identification and diagnosis of patients with CHF but there is a danger that it may fall short of ensuring optimal treatment for patients with CHF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heart. 2000 May;83(5):596-602 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1369-75 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Jun;3(3):283-91 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):715-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Jan;4(1):11-22 - PubMed

Substances