Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES)
- PMID: 15879332
- DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000166048.35740.a9
Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared with Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES)
Abstract
Background and purpose: In hypertensive stroke patients, for the same level of blood pressure control, eprosartan will be more effective than nitrendipine in reducing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Methods: A total of 1405 well-defined, high-risk hypertensives with cerebral event during the last 24 months (proven by cerebral computed tomography scan or nuclear magnetic resonance) were randomized to eprosartan or nitrendipine (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Primary end point was the composite of total mortality and all cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including all recurrent events.
Results: Randomization was successful without significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Blood pressure was reduced to a comparable extent without any significant differences between the 2 groups during the whole study period (150.7/84 mm Hg and 152.0/87.2 mm Hg with eprosartan and nitrendipine therapy to 137.5/80.8 mm Hg and 136.0/80.2 mm Hg, respectively, confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring). Moreover, already after 3 months, normotensive mean values were achieved, and 75.5% reached values <140/90 mm Hg with the eprosartan regimen and 77.7% with the nitrendipine regimen. During follow-up, in total, 461 primary events occurred: 206 eprosartan and 255 nitrendipine (incidence density ratio [IDR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.96; P=0.014). Cardiovascular events were: 77 eprosartan and 101 nitrendipine (IDR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02; P=0.06); cerebrovascular events: 102 eprosartan and134 nitrendipine (IDR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97; P=0.03).
Conclusions: The Morbidity and Mortality After Stroke, Eprosartan Compared With Nitrendipine for Secondary Prevention (MOSES) study was the first to compare an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist with a calcium antagonist in secondary stroke prevention. In these high-risk hypertensive stroke patients, an early normotensive and comparable blood pressure was achieved. The combined primary end point was significantly lower in the eprosartan group.
Comment in
-
Secondary prevention of stroke is important: but all hypertensive drugs are not created equal?Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1225-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000166044.06026.46. Epub 2005 May 5. Stroke. 2005. PMID: 15879334 No abstract available.
-
Morbidity and mortality after stroke--eprosartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):335-6; author reply 338. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199659.31103.d2. Epub 2006 Jan 5. Stroke. 2006. PMID: 16397169 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
MOSES raises questions.Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):338-9; author reply 339-40. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199643.05768.8f. Epub 2006 Jan 5. Stroke. 2006. PMID: 16397172 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
MOSES: superiority or noninferiority?Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):337; author reply 338. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199615.57335.87. Epub 2006 Jan 5. Stroke. 2006. PMID: 16397180 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Does the MOSES trial establish superiority of AT1-receptor blockers over dihydropyridine/calcium antagonists in secondary stroke prevention?Stroke. 2006 Feb;37(2):336-7; author reply 338. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199614.67737.e0. Epub 2006 Jan 5. Stroke. 2006. PMID: 16397183 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Does the MOSES study provide sufficient evidence for Eprosartan against Nitrendipine?Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1357; author reply 1358. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000222992.66497.54. Epub 2006 Apr 27. Stroke. 2006. PMID: 16645128 No abstract available.
-
Morbidity and mortality after stroke--eposartan compared with nitrendipine for secondary prevention: principal results of a prospective randomized controlled study (MOSES).Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007 Mar;9(1):5. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007. PMID: 17362677 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost-utility analysis of eprosartan compared to enalapril in primary prevention and nitrendipine in secondary prevention in Europe--the HEALTH model.Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):857-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00507.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19508663
-
Eprosartan: a review of its use in hypertension.Drugs. 2009;69(17):2477-99. doi: 10.2165/11203980-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19911859 Review.
-
Preventing cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events after stroke: eprosartan or nitrendipine?Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006 Jan;2(1):24-5. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0090. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006. PMID: 16932517 No abstract available.
-
Does the MOSES study provide sufficient evidence for Eprosartan against Nitrendipine?Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1357; author reply 1358. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000222992.66497.54. Epub 2006 Apr 27. Stroke. 2006. PMID: 16645128 No abstract available.
-
Risk reduction by preventing stroke: need for blockade of angiotensin II and catecholamines?Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Nov;23 Suppl 5:S25-9. doi: 10.1185/030079907X260737. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007. PMID: 18093411 Review.
Cited by
-
Combined therapy with a calcium channel blocker and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jan;10(1 Suppl 1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.08029.x. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008. PMID: 18174781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving Cerebrovascular Function to Increase Neuronal Recovery in Neurodegeneration Associated to Cardiovascular Disease.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Feb 7;8:53. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00053. eCollection 2020. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020. PMID: 32117979 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of eprosartan on serum metabolic parameters in patients with essential hypertension.Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2007;1:22-6. doi: 10.2174/1874192400701010022. Epub 2007 Nov 14. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2007. PMID: 18949087 Free PMC article.
-
Basilar branch occlusion.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2011 Jun;13(3):247-60. doi: 10.1007/s11936-011-0125-x. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2011. PMID: 21461671
-
Comparison of infection risks and clinical outcomes in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 lung infection under renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;87(6):2475-2492. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14660. Epub 2020 Dec 18. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 33217033 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical