Why clinicians are natural bayesians
- PMID: 15879401
- PMCID: PMC557240
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1080
Why clinicians are natural bayesians
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1369
Abstract
Thought you didn't understand bayesian statistics? Read on and find out why doctors are expert in applying the theory, whether they realise it or not
Figures
Comment in
-
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: clinicians have to be bayesians.BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390-1; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-c. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15947413 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: is there a bayesian doctor in the house?BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-b. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15947414 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Why clinicians are natural bayesians: bayesian confusion.BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1390; author reply 1390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1390-a. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15947415 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Berry D. Statistics, a bayesian perspective. 1st ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1996.
-
- Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. II. The Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med 1999;130: 1005-13. - PubMed
-
- Selker HP, Griffith JL, D'Agostino RB. A tool for judging coronary care unit admission appropriateness, valid for both real-time and retrospective use. A time-insensitive predictive instrument (TIPI) for acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter study. Med Care 1991;29: 610-27. - PubMed
-
- Stolzenberg J, London R. Reliability of stress thallium-201 scanning in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease. Clin Nucl Med 1979;4: 225-8. - PubMed
-
- Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1994;271: 703-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources