Genomic and proteomic comparisons between bacterial and archaeal genomes and related comparisons with the yeast and fly genomes
- PMID: 15883367
- PMCID: PMC1129125
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502314102
Genomic and proteomic comparisons between bacterial and archaeal genomes and related comparisons with the yeast and fly genomes
Abstract
Bacterial, archaeal, yeast, and fly genomes are compared with respect to predicted highly expressed (PHX) genes and several genomic properties. There is a striking difference in the status of PHX ribosomal protein (RP) genes where the archaeal genome generally encodes more RP genes and fewer PHX RPs compared with bacterial genomes. The increase in RPs in archaea and eukaryotes compared with that in bacteria may reflect a more complex set of interactions in archaea and eukaryotes in regulating translation, e.g., differences in structure requiring scaffolding of longer rRNA molecules, expanded interactions with the chaperone machinery, and, in eukaryotic interactions with endoplasmic reticulum components. The yeast genome is similar to fast-growing bacteria in PHX genes but also features several cytoskeletal genes, including actin and tropomyosin, and several signal transduction regulatory proteins from the 14.3.3 family. The most PHX genes of Drosophila encode cytoskeletal and exoskeletal proteins. We found that the preference of a microorganism for an anaerobic metabolism correlates with the number of PHX enzymes of the glycolysis pathway that well exceeds the number of PHX enzymes acting in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Conversely, if the number of PHX enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle well exceeds the PHX enzymes of glycolysis, an aerobic metabolism is preferred. Where the numbers are approximately commensurate, a facultative growth behavior prevails.
Similar articles
-
Predicted highly expressed genes of diverse prokaryotic genomes.J Bacteriol. 2000 Sep;182(18):5238-50. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.18.5238-5250.2000. J Bacteriol. 2000. PMID: 10960111 Free PMC article.
-
Predicted highly expressed genes in archaeal genomes.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 17;102(20):7303-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502313102. Epub 2005 May 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005. PMID: 15883368 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizations of highly expressed genes of four fast-growing bacteria.J Bacteriol. 2001 Sep;183(17):5025-40. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5025-5040.2001. J Bacteriol. 2001. PMID: 11489855 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Genomics for Prokaryotes.Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1704:55-78. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_3. Methods Mol Biol. 2018. PMID: 29277863 Review.
-
Genomics of bacteria and archaea: the emerging dynamic view of the prokaryotic world.Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Dec;36(21):6688-719. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn668. Epub 2008 Oct 23. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008. PMID: 18948295 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Translational selection is ubiquitous in prokaryotes.PLoS Genet. 2010 Jun 24;6(6):e1001004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001004. PLoS Genet. 2010. PMID: 20585573 Free PMC article.
-
The Code of Silence: Widespread Associations Between Synonymous Codon Biases and Gene Function.J Mol Evol. 2016 Jan;82(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00239-015-9714-8. Epub 2015 Nov 4. J Mol Evol. 2016. PMID: 26538122 Review.
-
The landscape of microbial phenotypic traits and associated genes.Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Dec 1;44(21):10074-10090. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw964. Epub 2016 Oct 24. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016. PMID: 27915291 Free PMC article.
-
Lost in translation: translational interference from a recurrent mutation in exon 1 of MECP2.J Med Genet. 2006 Jun;43(6):470-7. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.036244. Epub 2005 Sep 9. J Med Genet. 2006. PMID: 16155192 Free PMC article.
-
Inferring gene function from evolutionary change in signatures of translation efficiency.Genome Biol. 2014 Mar 3;15(3):R44. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r44. Genome Biol. 2014. PMID: 24580753 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases