Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Feb;17(2):160-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1311-8. Epub 2005 May 10.

Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse

Affiliations

Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse

Kenneth Powers et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review our experience with pessary use for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Charts of patients treated for Stage III and IV prolapse were reviewed. Comparisons were made between patients who tried or refused pessary use. A successful trial of pessary was defined by continued use; a failed trial was defined by a patient's discontinued use. Thirty-two patients tried a pessary; 45 refused. Patients who refused a pessary were younger, had lesser degree of prolapse, and more often had urinary incontinence. Most patients (62.5%) continued pessary use and avoided surgery. Unsuccessful trial of pessary resorting to surgery included four patients (33%) with unwillingness to maintain, three patients (25%) with inability to retain and two patients (17%) with vaginal erosion and/or discharge. Our findings suggest that pessary use is an acceptable first-line option for treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BJOG. 2001 Jan;108(1):112-3 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2000;11(1):48-60 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Med. 1993 Dec;38(12):919-23 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):1019-20 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;90(4 Pt 2):691-2 - PubMed