Comparison of gene expression measurements from cDNA and 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays
- PMID: 15885493
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.02.012
Comparison of gene expression measurements from cDNA and 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays
Abstract
As the data generated by microarray technology continue to amass, it is necessary to compare and combine gene expression data from different platforms. To evaluate the performance of cDNA and long oligonucleotide (60-mer) arrays, we generated gene expression profiles for two cancer cell lines and compared the data between the two platforms. All 6182 unique genes represented on both platforms were included in the analysis. A limited correlation (r = 0.4708) was obtained and the difference in measurement of low-expression genes was considered to contribute to the limited correlation. Further restriction of the data set to differentially expressed genes detected in cDNA microarrays (1205 genes) and oligonucleotide arrays (1325 genes) showed modest correlations of 0.7076 and 0.6441 between the two platforms. Quantitative real-time PCR measurements of a set of 10 genes showed better correlation with oligonucleotide arrays. Our results demonstrate that there is substantial variation in the data generated from cDNA and 60-mer oligonucleotide arrays. Although general agreement was observed in measurements of differentially expressed genes, we suggest that data from different platforms could not be directly amassed.
Similar articles
-
Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.BMC Genomics. 2006 Mar 21;7:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-59. BMC Genomics. 2006. PMID: 16551369 Free PMC article.
-
Cross platform microarray analysis for robust identification of differentially expressed genes.BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Mar 8;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S1-S5. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007. PMID: 17430572 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of genes related to gastrointestinal tract origin cancer cells using a cDNA microarray.Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 1;11(1):79-86. Clin Cancer Res. 2005. PMID: 15671531
-
Molecular techniques for studying gene expression in carcinogenesis.J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2002 Nov;20(2):77-116. doi: 10.1081/GNC-120016201. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2002. PMID: 12515671 Review.
-
[cDNA microarray technology as a laboratory examination method: a gene expression profiling test for analysis of drug resistance in tumor cells].Rinsho Byori. 2002 Feb;50(2):161-8. Rinsho Byori. 2002. PMID: 11925854 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
The Longissimus and Semimembranosus muscles display marked differences in their gene expression profiles in pig.PLoS One. 2014 May 8;9(5):e96491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096491. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24809746 Free PMC article.
-
Antagonism between MES-4 and Polycomb repressive complex 2 promotes appropriate gene expression in C. elegans germ cells.Cell Rep. 2012 Nov 29;2(5):1169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Oct 25. Cell Rep. 2012. PMID: 23103171 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the prediction accuracy in classification using the combined data sets by ranks of gene expressions.BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 16;9:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-283. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008. PMID: 18554423 Free PMC article.
-
Robust interlaboratory reproducibility of a gene expression signature measurement consistent with the needs of a new generation of diagnostic tools.BMC Genomics. 2007 Jun 7;8:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-148. BMC Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17553173 Free PMC article.
-
A detailed transcript-level probe annotation reveals alternative splicing based microarray platform differences.BMC Genomics. 2007 Aug 20;8:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-284. BMC Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17708771 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous