Physicians' liability in obstetric and gynecology practice
- PMID: 15887609
Physicians' liability in obstetric and gynecology practice
Abstract
Purpose: Litigation in obstetric and gynecologic practice has arisen as an important issue. This article aims to highlight issues related to malpractice in obstetrics and gynecology in order to point out several important aspects of medical practice, which may offer adequate professional protection.
Methods and material: Search of the current relevant literature.
Results: The four most common clinical causes of medical litigation in obstetrics and gynecology are cases involving fetal distress, uterine rupture after a vaginal birth in a woman with a previous Cesarean section, shoulder dystocia, and misdiagnosis of breast cancer. Litigation raised in most of the cases is driven by bad outcomes and not by malpractice. Additionally, both juries and the public often expect perfection as the natural result of pregnancy and any deviation from this expectation has to be the result of someone's negligence. For this reason it has become mandatory for doctors in hospitals and private practices to acquire a sufficient knowledge relating to modem management, to document carefully in writing their procedural and management plans and to become familiar with the legal aspects of medical practice. Adequate communication and a written patient's consent form are of paramount importance.
Conclusion: Maintenance of high standards in daily practice with continuous training, clear communication and a signed Patient's Informed Consent Form along with the appropriate documentation of any procedure carried out may provide professional safety to practicing obstetricians and gynecologists in case of medical litigation.
Similar articles
-
Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 May;40:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 21. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016. PMID: 26947435
-
A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 24;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0065-1. BMC Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26498823 Free PMC article.
-
Concept of defensive medicine and litigation among Sudanese doctors working in obstetrics and gynecology.BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 9;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0095-3. BMC Med Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26860084 Free PMC article.
-
Medical litigation in cosmetic plastic surgery.Med Law. 2004;23(3):479-88. Med Law. 2004. PMID: 15532942 Review.
-
Overview of professional liability.Clin Perinatol. 2007 Jun;34(2):227-32, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.03.002. Clin Perinatol. 2007. PMID: 17572231 Review.
Cited by
-
Improved overall delivery documentation following implementation of a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form.J Perinat Med. 2011 Oct 24;40(1):97-100. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2011.112. J Perinat Med. 2011. PMID: 22017330 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;117(6):1272-1278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821a12c9. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21555962 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of malpractice claims in mammography: a complex issue.Radiol Med. 2009 Jun;114(4):636-44. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0394-6. Epub 2009 May 14. Radiol Med. 2009. PMID: 19444589 English, Italian.
-
Shoulder dystocia: an Evidence-Based approach.J Prenat Med. 2010 Jul;4(3):35-42. J Prenat Med. 2010. PMID: 22439059 Free PMC article.
-
A History of Medical Liability: From Ancient Times to Today.Cureus. 2023 Jul 9;15(7):e41593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41593. eCollection 2023 Jul. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37559862 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials