Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jun;144(1):1-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0070-z. Epub 2005 May 11.

Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations

Oliver Bossdorf et al. Oecologia. 2005 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Plant invasions often involve rapid evolutionary change. Founder effects, hybridization, and adaptation to novel environments cause genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations and may contribute to the success of invaders. An influential idea in this context has been the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) hypothesis. It proposes that after enemy release plants rapidly evolve to be less defended but more competitive, thereby increasing plant vigour in introduced populations. To detect evolutionary change in invaders, comparative studies of native versus introduced populations are needed. Here, we review the current empirical evidence from: (1) comparisons of phenotypic variation in natural populations; (2) comparisons of molecular variation with neutral genetic markers; (3) comparisons of quantitative genetic variation in a common environment; and (4) comparisons of phenotypic plasticity across different environments. Field data suggest that increased vigour and reduced herbivory are common in introduced plant populations. In molecular studies, the genetic diversity of introduced populations was not consistently different from that of native populations. Multiple introductions of invasive plants appear to be the rule rather than the exception. In tests of the EICA hypothesis in a common environment, several found increased growth or decreased resistance in introduced populations. However, few provided a full test of the EICA hypothesis by addressing growth and defence in the same species. Overall, there is reasonable empirical evidence to suggest that genetic differentiation through rapid evolutionary change is important in plant invasions. We discuss conceptual and methodological issues associated with cross-continental comparisons and make recommendations for future research. When testing for EICA, greater emphasis should be put on competitive ability and plant tolerance. Moreover, it is important to address evolutionary change in characteristics other than defence and growth that could play a role in plant invasions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am Nat. 2001 Feb;157(2):231-6 - PubMed
    1. Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Oct;83(# (Pt 4)):476-84 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1991 Sep;88(1):84-90 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2004 Feb 19;427(6976):731-3 - PubMed
    1. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Apr 22;270(1517):775-81 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources