Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Jul;92(7):856-8.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.4986.

Risk of tumour seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Risk of tumour seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

T Livraghi et al. Br J Surg. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Background: A recent small study reported a high rate of neoplastic seeding after cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who had undergone previous needle biopsy. Tumour seeding was associated with subcapsular tumour location, poorly differentiated tumours and a high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of neoplastic seeding after RFA in a large series of unselected patients with HCC who had a long follow-up.

Methods: A total of 1314 patients with 2542 nodules were treated in three centres. Median follow-up was 37 months. Needle biopsy had been performed before RFA in 241 patients (18.3 per cent). The influence of subcapsular location, high AFP level and previous biopsy on risk of tumour seeding was assessed.

Results: Neoplastic seeding was identified in 12 patients (0.9 per cent); the rate was comparable at the three centres (0.9, 0.7 and 1.4 per cent). Only previous biopsy was significantly associated with tumour seeding (P = 0.004).

Conclusion: RFA with a cooled-tip needle was associated with a low risk of neoplastic seeding, even in unselected patients. The use of biopsy before RFA is to be discouraged, particularly when liver transplantation is a possibility at a later date.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types