Intestinal nematode infections in children: the pathophysiological price paid

Abstract

The mechanism by which small animals such as rodents resist or eliminate nematode parasites requires mucosal inflammation as the final effector of the immune response. The resulting freedom from chronic infection may be worth the price of short-term illness. Putative vaccines which attempt to enhance the natural effect will have to take into account the inflammatory cost to the host. Human helminthiases involve a more stable equilibrium between host and parasite. The medical literature on hookworm disease and clinical ascariasis describes, for the former, some chronic inflammatory effects correlated with worm burden, but for the latter a less quantified or predictable set of detrimental effects. We describe a current, systematic study of the inflammatory response to whipworm infection, in which anaemia, growth retardation and intestinal leakiness are viewed as predictable consequences related to infection intensity. There is evidence for the absence of cell-mediated immunopathology. However, a specific, IgE-mediated local anaphylaxis may, at least partly, mediate the deleterious effects. Increased numbers of mucosal macrophages may also contribute to the chronic, systemic effects through their output of cytokines. Similar attempts to show the mechanisms of pathogenesis and quantify the effects of hookworm disease should be undertaken.