Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May-Jun;6(3):173-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.01.002.

Improving the quality of residential care using goal attainment scaling

Affiliations

Improving the quality of residential care using goal attainment scaling

Gina Bravo et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To illustrate the potential of goal attainment scaling (GAS) as a means to improve the quality of care provided by residential care facilities to frail older adults.

Design: A pre-test/post-test single-group design.

Settings/participants: Twenty facilities providing inadequate care to at least one resident. These facilities were identified with a case-finding questionnaire followed by a thorough investigation of the quality of care delivered to a sample of frail older adults.

Intervention: The 6-month intervention was conducted by three interdisciplinary teams of health professionals experienced in caring for frail older adults. The intervention was tailored to the main quality problems identified at baseline in the facility. The first task of the intervention team was to set weighted priority goals in conjunction with the facility manager. Subsequent monthly on-site visits, interspersed with frequent telephone calls, were devoted to assisting the manager and staff implement permanent changes in the areas of care targeted for improvement.

Measurements: Pre- and post-intervention GAS scores.

Results: Two facilities were lost to follow-up. A total of 81 facility goals were established at the onset of the study. Goals per facility ranged from 2 to 9 (mean = 4.5, SD = 2.04). GAS scores increased significantly between pre- and post-intervention (P < .001). Goal achievement varied with the manager's own rating of the quality of care provided in the facility (P = .008), his/her education level (P = .037), and the intervention team (P = .049).

Conclusions: This study shows that quality improvement objectives established with the manager following a thorough evaluation of the quality of care provided in the facility can, on average, be attained with the help of experienced health professionals. It also provides some insight into the types of facilities where preset objectives are more likely to be achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Republished in

Publication types