Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 May;82(5):432-438.
doi: 10.1097/01.OPX.0000162660.14378.30.

Sensitivity of screening tests for detecting vision in preschoolers-targeted vision disorders when specificity is 94%

No authors listed
Comparative Study

Sensitivity of screening tests for detecting vision in preschoolers-targeted vision disorders when specificity is 94%

No authors listed. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the sensitivity of 11 preschool vision screening tests administered by licensed eye care professionals for the detection of the 4 Vision in Preschoolers (VIP)-targeted vision disorders when specificity is 94%.

Methods: This study consisted of a sample (n = 2588) of 3- to 5-year-old children enrolled in Head Start programs, 57% of whom had failed an initial Head Start vision screening. Screening results from 11 tests were compared with results from a standardized comprehensive eye examination that was used to classify children with respect to the four VIP-targeted vision disorders: amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and unexplained reduced visual acuity (VA). With overall specificity set to 94%, we calculated the sensitivity for the detection of each targeted vision disorder.

Results: With the overall specificity set to 94%, the most accurate tests for detection of amblyopia were noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR) (88% sensitivity), the SureSight Vision Screener (80%), and the Retinomax Autorefractor (78%). For detection of strabismus, the most accurate tests were the MTI Photoscreener (65%), the cover-uncover test (60%), the Stereo Smile II stereoacuity test (58%), the SureSight Vision Screener (54%), and the Retinomax Autorefractor (54% in year 1, 53% in year 2). The most accurate tests for detection of significant refractive error were NCR (74%), the Retinomax Autorefractor (66%), the SureSight Vision Screener (63%), and the Lea Symbols VA test (58%). For detection of reduced VA, the most accurate tests were the Lea Symbols Distance VA test (48%), the Retinomax Autorefractor (39%), and NCR (38%).

Conclusions: Similar to the previously reported results at 90% specificity, the screening tests vary widely in sensitivity with specificity set at 94%. The rankings of the sensitivities for detection of the 4 VIP-targeted vision disorders are similar to those with specificity set to 90%.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The Vision In Preschoolers Study Group. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:637–50.
    1. Arnold RW. Highly specific photoscreening at the Alaska State Fair. Valid Alaska Blind Child Discovery photography and interpretation. Alaska Med 2003;45:34–40.
    1. Duffy SW, Rohan TE, Altman DG. A method for combining matched and unmatched binary data. Application to randomized, controlled trials of photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:371–8.
    1. Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB and the AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Preschool vision screening: what should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies. J AAPOS 2003;7:314–6.
    1. Woodruff ME. Observations on the visual acuity of children during the first five years of life. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1972;49:205–15.

Publication types