Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model
- PMID: 15897831
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000162441.23824.95
Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model
Abstract
Study design: In vitro investigation of cervical adjacent level intradiscal pressures (IDPs) following a total disc replacement arthroplasty.
Objectives: The current in vitro study was undertaken to compare adjacent level IDPs and operative level kinematics following a cervical arthroplasty versus an arthrodesis procedure.
Summary of background data: Clinical data indicate the incidence of symptomatic transition syndrome to be as high as 3% annually following a cervical interbody arthrodesis. Recent developments in the motion preservation technology should, in theory, minimize transition syndrome at the adjacent levels.
Methods: A total of 10 human cadaveric cervical spines were used in this investigation. Following intact analysis, all specimens were sequentially reconstructed at C5-C6 with 1) total disc replacement (TDR), 2) allograft dowel, and 3) allograft dowel + anterior cervical plate. Testing was performed in displacement control under axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending loading modes. IDPs were recorded at C4-C5 and C6-C7 whereas peak range of motion (ROM) and NZ were monitored at C5-C6 level.
Results: Similar IDPs were recorded between the intact condition and a TDR reconstruction at both adjacent levels under all loading modes (P > 0.05). However, the C4-C5 IDP values produced under flexion/extension testing for both arthrodesis treatments were significantly higher than the means obtained for the intact and disc replacement groups (P < 0.05). Similar intergroup differences were observed at the C6-C7 level; however, statistical significance was achieved during all three loading methods (P < 0.05). C5-C6 ROM analysis indicated a significantly lower ROM for both arthrodesis constructs compared with intact and TDR groups during flexion/extension testing (P < 0.05). No differences were recorded between the intact and the total disc replacement group under any loading conditions (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: This is a first study to document that a cervical disc replacement arthroplasty procedure maintains adjacent level IDPs and reconstruction level kinematics near the preoperative values. Consequently, total disc replacement may provide an alternative to conventional surgical management of cervical discogenic pathology decreasing the incidence of symptomatic transition syndrome.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20362252
-
Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):918-25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.034. Epub 2008 Jan 7. Spine J. 2008. PMID: 18178528
-
Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 14. World Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 24937596
-
Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.015. Spine J. 2004. PMID: 15541670 Review.
-
Intervertebral disc arthroplasty.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2779-86. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146460.11591.8a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15564927 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):674-80. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2094-x. Epub 2011 Dec 2. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22134486 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature.Ochsner J. 2014 Spring;14(1):78-83. Ochsner J. 2014. PMID: 24688337 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ISASS Policy Statement - Cervical Artificial Disc.Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8:6. doi: 10.14444/1006. eCollection 2014. Int J Spine Surg. 2014. PMID: 25694944 Free PMC article.
-
[Total cervical disk replacement--implant-specific approaches: keel implant (Prodisc-C intervertebral disk prosthesis)].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Nov;22(5-6):480-94. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-9024-7. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 21153007 German.
-
Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):841-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6. Epub 2009 May 12. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19434431 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous