Perception of pitch location within a speaker's F0 range
- PMID: 15898660
- DOI: 10.1121/1.1841751
Perception of pitch location within a speaker's F0 range
Abstract
Fundamental frequency (F0) is used for many purposes in speech, but its linguistic significance is based on its relation to the speaker's range, not its absolute value. While it may be that listeners can gauge a specific pitch relative to a speaker's range by recognizing it from experience, whether they can do the same for an unfamiliar voice is an open question. The present experiment explored that question. Twenty native speakers of English (10 male, 10 female) produced the vowel /a/ with a spoken (not sung) voice quality at varying pitches within their own ranges. Listeners then judged, without familiarization or context, where each isolated F0 lay within each speaker's range. Correlations were high both for the entire range (0.721) and for the range minus the extremes (0.609). Correlations were somewhat higher when the F0s were related to the range of all the speakers, either separated by sex (0.830) or pooled (0.848), but several factors discussed here may help account for this pattern. Regardless, the present data provide strong support for the hypothesis that listeners are able to locate an F0 reliably within a range without external context or prior exposure to a speaker's voice.
Similar articles
-
Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1100-12. doi: 10.1121/1.4714351. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012. PMID: 22894229
-
Segmental Influences on the Perception of High Pitch Accent Scaling in American English.Lang Speech. 2025 Jun;68(2):278-312. doi: 10.1177/00238309241255319. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Lang Speech. 2025. PMID: 39113284
-
Direct and octave-shifted pitch matching during nonword imitations in men, women, and children.J Voice. 2015 Mar;29(2):260.e21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Nov 25. J Voice. 2015. PMID: 25439509 Free PMC article.
-
The language- specific interdependence of tonal and durational cues in perceived rhythmicality.Phonetica. 2011;68(1-2):1-25. doi: 10.1159/000327223. Epub 2011 Jul 21. Phonetica. 2011. PMID: 21804331 Review.
-
A systematic review of the voice-tagging hypothesis of speech-in-noise perception.Neuropsychologia. 2020 Jan;136:107256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107256. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Neuropsychologia. 2020. PMID: 31715197
Cited by
-
Identification of speaker sex from one vowel across a range of fundamental frequencies.J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3095-104. doi: 10.1121/1.3488347. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010. PMID: 21110605 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Minerva Orthosis on Larynx Height in Young, Healthy Volunteers.Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2017 Dec 15;10:1179550617746961. doi: 10.1177/1179550617746961. eCollection 2017. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2017. PMID: 29276420 Free PMC article.
-
Recognition of Speech With Dynamic Pitch Manipulation in Noise: Effects of Manipulation Methods.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jan 8;67(1):269-281. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00142. Epub 2023 Nov 20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024. PMID: 37983169 Free PMC article.
-
What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):219-46. doi: 10.1037/a0022325. Psychol Rev. 2011. PMID: 21417542 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Voice Quality Cues in the Pitch Perception of Speech and Non-speech Utterances.Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 29;9:2147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02147. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30555365 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources