A phase II study of vinorelbine and estramustine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer
- PMID: 15899211
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02710012
A phase II study of vinorelbine and estramustine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer
Abstract
Introduction: This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in patients with chemotherapy-naïve hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Material and methods: Patients received vinorelbine (i.v. 25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and estramustine (oral, 600 mg/m2) daily. Eligible patients were required to have progressive metastatic disease following the first hormonal manipulation.
Results: Of the 51 patients enrolled (median age = 69 years), 84% presented bone involvement and 75% had at least two organs involved at the time of study entry and 47 were evaluable for treatment efficacy. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response (> or =50% decrease) which was the primary efficacy criterion was reported in 21 patients (41.2%) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in 20 patients (48.8%) in the per protocol (PP) population. Of the 7 patients with measurable disease, 2 achieved partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.7 months (range: 1.9-8.6) and 14.3 months (range: 4.2-21.2), respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 6.1% of patients and in 1% of cycles. The incidence of complicated neutropenia (febrile neutropenia reported in 1 patient and septic shock with severe neutropenia reported in 2 patients) was 5.8%. The most frequent grade 3-4 non-haematological events (% of patients > or =5%) included anorexia (10%), thrombosis/embolism (8%), vomiting and hypotension (6% each). There were 3 toxic deaths (5.9 %) resulting from pulmonary embolism, angina pectoris, and septic shock. The impact of combined chemotherapy on the quality-of-life (QL) of the patients was assessed between baseline and the first evaluation scheduled at 6 weeks indicated a marked reduction in pain while the rest of the symptoms remained stable. Overall, health status improved slightly over the treatment period.
Conclusions: This study confirmed that the combination of vinorelbine and estramustine is an active regimen in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy. Main toxicities included complicated neutropenia even though the incidence of severe neutropenia was low. We observed a higher incidence of toxic deaths which could have been related to the regimen of estramustine used in the study.
Similar articles
-
Phase II study of estramustine, oral etoposide, and vinorelbine in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.Am J Clin Oncol. 1997 Aug;20(4):383-6. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199708000-00013. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9256895 Clinical Trial.
-
Dose escalation of oral vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate.Cancer. 2006 Jun 15;106(12):2617-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21927. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16691618 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase II study of vinorelbine and low-dose docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.Cancer J. 2003 Jul-Aug;9(4):286-92. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200307000-00011. Cancer J. 2003. PMID: 12967139 Clinical Trial.
-
Docetaxel (Taxotere) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.Semin Oncol. 2000 Apr;27(2 Suppl 3):24-9. Semin Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10810935 Review.
-
EMP combination chemotherapy and low-dose monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2002 Feb;2(1):59-71. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2.1.59. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2002. PMID: 12113067 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing outcomes in prostate cancer clinical trials: a twenty-first century tower of Babel.Cancer. 2008 Sep 1;113(5):966-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23719. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18661513 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous