Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Sep;90(9):909-15.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.057620. Epub 2005 May 17.

Randomised trial of parental support for families with very preterm children: outcome at 5 years

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised trial of parental support for families with very preterm children: outcome at 5 years

S Johnson et al. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: To test the effectiveness of a home based developmental education intervention in improving outcome at 5 years for very preterm infants.

Methods: The Avon Premature Infant Project (APIP) is a randomised controlled trial in which the parents of 284 babies born <33 weeks gestational age received a developmental education programme, a social support intervention, or standard care. A term reference population was also recruited. This study reports outcomes at 5 years (mean age 58 months 15 days) for 187 (66%) of these children without disability. Outcomes were assessed using the British Ability Scales II for cognitive development, the Movement ABC for motor impairment, and the Child Behavior Checklist for behavioural problems.

Results: Preterm infants showed poorer cognitive performance than their term peers. Mean (SD) general conceptual ability (GCA) scores were: Portage 99.2 (15.7); parent adviser 100.3 (14.8); preterm control 101.1 (15.0); term reference 107.2 (13.4). There were no significant differences between preterm groups in GCA scores indicating no effect of either intervention. Similarly, there was no significant effect of intervention on behavioural or motor outcomes. Further analyses, in which outcome data were adjusted for social factors, did not reveal any differences between the three preterm groups or by subgroups classified by a range of perinatal variables.

Conclusion: The small advantage shown at 2 years of age is no longer detectable at 5 years. These results question the effectiveness of early intervention in enhancing cognitive, behavioural, and motor function at 5 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow and long term follow up at 5 years.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean differences (95% CI) in GCA scores for the Portage, parent adviser, and preterm control groups from the term reference group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect size (95% CI) of social variables and interventions on BAS-II GCA scores at 5 years.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean differences (95% CI) in GCA scores from preterm controls for the Portage (P) and parent adviser (PA) groups categorised by perinatal variables.

References

    1. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1988 Apr;9(2):73-8 - PubMed
    1. Res Nurs Health. 2001 Oct;24(5):373-89 - PubMed
    1. J Ment Defic Res. 1991 Apr;35 ( Pt 2):89-112 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1992 Mar;120(3):350-9 - PubMed
    1. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8(4):298-308 - PubMed

Publication types