Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Aug;90(8):4525-9.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0439. Epub 2005 May 17.

Quality of life in childhood onset growth hormone-deficient patients in the transition phase from childhood to adulthood

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Quality of life in childhood onset growth hormone-deficient patients in the transition phase from childhood to adulthood

Andrea F Attanasio et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) has not been specifically assessed in GH-deficient (GHD) transition patients.

Methods: We assessed QoL at baseline and after 1 and 2 yr of GH treatment in severely GHD patients, using an adult GHD-specific questionnaire, QLS(M)-H. Subjects were randomized to GH, 25.0 microg/kg.d (n = 25) or 12.5 microg/kg.d (n = 28), or no treatment (n = 13). sd scores for QLS-H were calculated from normative data, specific to country of origin, gender, and age range of the patients.

Results: Baseline QLS-H sd scores were -0.35 +/- 1.17 in females and -0.70 +/- 1.05 in males (P = 0.280). sd scores for individual dimensions of ability to become sexually aroused, ability to tolerate stress, body shape, concentration, initiative/drive, physical stamina, and self-confidence were significantly lower than the normal average. Particularly affected were body shape (sd score, -0.80 +/- 0.99; quartile (Q)1:Q3, -1.52:-0.29) and sexual arousal (sd score, -0.41 +/- 0.88; Q1:Q3, -1.15:-0.13). Total QLS-H sd score increased slightly but not significantly for combined GH treatment groups compared with control at yr 1 (0.047 +/- 1.51 vs. -0.32 +/- 1.66; P = 0.845) but not after yr 2 (-0.00 +/- 0.80 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.89; P = 0.385); no dose effect of GH was observed. GH treatment significantly increased sd score from baseline to yr 2 for sexual arousal and body shape (0.23 +/- 0.78, P = 0.038; and 0.46 +/- 1.26, P = 0.035, respectively).

Conclusion: Although overall baseline QoL was not compromised in severely GHD patients during the transition period, dimensions related to age-specific psychological problems were significantly worse than healthy subjects and appeared to positively respond to GH treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances