Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 May-Jun;13(3):845-9.

Effective dose equivalents to patients undergoing cerebral angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effective dose equivalents to patients undergoing cerebral angiography

V M Feygelman et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992 May-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine values of the effective dose equivalent, HE, for patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography and compare these values with radiation doses received by patients undergoing other diagnostic examinations of the head.

Methods: The radiographic techniques for ten patients undergoing cerebral angiography were recorded and used to obtain the product of the entrance skin dose and the x-ray beam cross-sectional area. These measured dose-area product data were converted into effective dose equivalents employing published conversion factors which take into account the part of the patient anatomy irradiated and the radiographic technique factors employed.

Results: The average patient HE value was 10.6 mSv, with a range of 2.7-23.4 mSv. Fluoroscopy contributed approximately 67% of the total HE, with cut films and digital subtraction angiography contributing 26% and 7%, respectively.

Conclusions: The radiation doses (HE) to patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography are comparable to the patient doses in nuclear medicine brain studies where the typical HE is approximately 10 mSv. In CT, the patient dose is approximately 2 mSv, whereas in plain skull x-ray examinations, the patient dose is much lower at approximately 0.15 mSv.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • New risks, new doses.
    Russell JG, Fawcitt R. Russell JG, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992 May-Jun;13(3):850-2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992. PMID: 1590182 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources