The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries
- PMID: 15902181
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.047
The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries
Abstract
Objective: A forceps-assisted vaginal delivery is a well-recognized risk factor for anal sphincter injury. Some studies have shown that occiput posterior (OP) fetal head position is also associated with an increased risk for third- or fourth-degree lacerations. The objective of this study was to assess whether OP position confers an incrementally increased risk for anal sphincter injury above that present with forceps deliveries.
Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of 588 singleton, cephalic, forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries performed at our institution between January 1996 and October 2003. Maternal demographics, labor and delivery characteristics, and neonatal factors were examined. Statistical analysis consisted of univariate statistics, Student t test, chi2, and logistic regression.
Results: The prevalence of occiput anterior (OA) and OP positions was 88.4% and 11.6%, respectively. The groups were similar in age, marital status, body mass index, use of epidural, frequency of inductions, episiotomies, and shoulder dystocias. The OA group had a higher frequency of rotational forceps (16.2% vs 5.9%, P = .03), greater birth weights (3304 +/- 526 g vs 3092 +/- 777 g, P = .004), and a larger percentage of white women (48.8% vs 34.3%, P = .04). Overall, 35% of forceps deliveries resulted in a third- or fourth-degree laceration. Anal sphincter injury occurred significantly more often in the OP group compared with the OA group (51.5% vs 32.9%, P = .003), giving an odds ratio of 2.2 (CI: 1.3-3.6). In a logistic regression model that controlled for occiput posterior position, maternal body mass index, race, length of second stage, episiotomy, birth weight, and rotational forceps, OP head position was 3.1 (CI: 1.6-6.2) times more likely to be associated with anal sphincter injury than OA head position.
Conclusion: Forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries have been associated with a greater risk for anal sphincter injury. Within this population of forceps deliveries, an OP position further increases the risk of third- or fourth-degree lacerations when compared with an OA position.
Similar articles
-
Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.059. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16098883
-
[Instrumental extractions using Thierry's spatulas: evaluation of the risk of perineal laceration according to occiput position in operative deliveries].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 May;37(3):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 21. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008. PMID: 18093747 French.
-
Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.030. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 14710059
-
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21802193 Review.
-
Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;19(5):474-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282ef4142. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17885465 Review.
Cited by
-
Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1251-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28222704 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2747-0. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 26044511 Review.
-
Labor and delivery outcomes by delivery method in term deliveries in occiput posterior position: a population-based retrospective cohort study.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Aug 5;2(4):100080. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100080. eCollection 2022 Nov. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36536849 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal complications and risk factors associated with assisted vaginal delivery.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06080-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37884886 Free PMC article.
-
[Labour in women with scarred uterus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: trial of scar and factors influencing the outcome].Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 1;27:71. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.71.12499. eCollection 2017. Pan Afr Med J. 2017. PMID: 28819492 Free PMC article. French.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous