Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 Jan;36(1):158-62.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.1.158.

Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing ceftazidime plus co-trimoxazole with chloramphenicol plus doxycycline and co-trimoxazole for treatment of severe melioidosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing ceftazidime plus co-trimoxazole with chloramphenicol plus doxycycline and co-trimoxazole for treatment of severe melioidosis

M Sookpranee et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Jan.

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was conducted at Srinagarind and Khon Kaen hospitals. Ceftazidime (100 mg/kg of body weight per day) and co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim, 8 mg/kg/day; sulfamethoxazole, 40 mg/kg/day) therapy was compared with conventional therapy (chloramphenicol, 100 mg/kg/day; doxycycline, 4 mg/kg/day; trimethoprim, 8 mg/kg/day; sulfamethoxazole, 40 mg/kg/day) in the treatment of 64 patients with bacteriologically confirmed cases of severe melioidosis who were admitted during September 1986 to January 1989. Of 61 evaluable patients (3 were excluded because of severe drug allergies), 42 were septicemic, and 31 of these patients had the most severe form, disseminated septicemic melioidosis. Their cumulative mortalities on day 7 were compared. There were significantly lower overall mortalities from melioidosis, septicemic melioidosis, and disseminated septicemic melioidosis in the group receiving the new treatment compared with those in the group receiving the conventional treatment (47 versus 18.5% [P = 0.039], 57.7 versus 25% [P = 0.039], and 82.3 versus 30.7% [P = 0.006], respectively); but the differences could have been influenced by the greater severity of illness, e.g., shock at initial presentation, in the patients who received the conventional treatment. Among patients with disseminated septicemia and initial shock, there was no significant difference in mortality between the regimens. Both regimens effectively eradicated bacteria from the circulation within 24 h (97 versus 96%, respectively). We recommend ceftazidime and co-trimoxazole as the drugs of choice for treatment of severe melioidosis, especially in those patients with disseminated septicemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mil Med. 1963 Jun;128:538-42 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1970 Feb;121(2):95-102 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1958 Jan 1;107(1):153-66 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1957 Nov;23(5):810-23 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):484-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources