Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;24(6):600-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.02.029.

[Perioperative evolution of the nutritional status in head and neck surgical patients. Prospective and descriptive case series]

[Article in French]
Affiliations

[Perioperative evolution of the nutritional status in head and neck surgical patients. Prospective and descriptive case series]

[Article in French]
E Wiel et al. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Aim of the study: To assess the perioperative evolution of the nutritional status of head and neck surgical patients.

Design: Prospective, descriptive case series.

Patients and methods: Fifty-four patients candidates for total or partial laryngectomy for malignancy of the neck tract without a past of neck surgery. The nutritional status of all patients hospitalized for total pharyngolaryngectomy, total or partial laryngectomy was assessed by 1) clinical parameters including weight (W), weight variation (WV, percentage of loss), Body Mass Index (BMI), triceps skin fold measurement (T), midarm circumference (M), and 2) biological parameters such as serum albumin (SA), transthyretin (TTR), lymphocytes (Ly). These parameters were noted at the time of diagnostic laryngoscopy (T1), the day before surgery (T2), and 10 days afterward (T3) when patients were authorized to eat normally. All patients had enteral nutrition (EN) support (35 kcal/kg/day) starting at D1 and for 10 days afterward. Only complete data per patient were analyzed.

Results: 24 patients were excluded. During the 21 days [7-53] preoperative period (T1-T2), WV was (6.6% [-8,1-+20.0] [T2] vs. 4.7% [-12,9-+20.0] [T1], p<0.05) without difference in T and M. In the postoperative period (T2-T3), all parameters worsened, except T, with: WV (8.2% [-8,1-+20.0] [T3], p<0.05 vs T2), M (27.4 cm [20.0-37.0] [T3] vs 28.3 cm [20.5-39.0] [T2], p<0.05) et TTR (0.21 mg/l [0.09-0.36] [T3] vs. 0.27 mg/l [0.08-0.45] [T2], p<0.05). BMI was 22.9 [15.2-36.7] (T1) vs 22.9 [15.2-35.3] (T2), NS and 22.1 [15.0-34.9] (T3), p<0.05 vs (T2).

Conclusion: The nutritional status in malignancy head and neck surgical patients seems to be best assessed by loss weight. It worsened mainly during the postoperative period even if a well-conducted EN was performed as defined by the French consensus conference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources