Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Apr;33(4):465-74.
doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-2502-7.

Evaluation of ablation patterns using a biophysical model of atrial fibrillation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of ablation patterns using a biophysical model of atrial fibrillation

L Dang et al. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmia. Surgical/Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a therapeutic procedure that consists of creating lines of conduction block to interrupt AF. The present study evaluated 13 different ablation patterns by means of a biophysical model of the human atria. In this model, ablation lines were abruptly applied transmurally during simulated sustained AF, and success rate, time to AF termination and average beat-to-beat interval were documented. The gold standard Cox's Maze III procedure was taken as reference. The effectiveness of twelve less invasive patterns was compared to it. In some of these incomplete lines (entailing a gap) were simulated. Finally, the computer simulations were compared to clinical data. The results show that the model reproduces observations made in vivo: (1) the Maze III is the most efficient ablation procedure; (2) less invasive patterns should include lines in both right and left atrium; (3) incomplete ablation lines between the pulmonary veins and the mitral valve annulus lead to uncommon flutter; (4) computer simulations of incomplete lines are consistent with clinical results of non-transumural RF ablation. Biophysical modeling may therefore be considered as a useful tool for understanding the mechanisms underlying AF therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources