Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming
- PMID: 15910129
- DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.428
Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming
Abstract
In 3 experiments, the authors investigated the extent to which objects that are about to be named are processed prior to fixation. Participants named pairs or triplets of objects. One of the objects, initially seen extrafoveally (the interloper), was replaced by a different object (the target) during the saccade toward it. The interloper-target pairs were identical or unrelated objects or visually and conceptually unrelated objects with homophonous names (e.g., animal- baseball bat). The mean latencies and gaze durations for the targets were shorter in the identity and homophone conditions than in the unrelated condition. This was true when participants viewed a fixation mark until the interloper appeared and when they fixated on another object and prepared to name it while viewing the interloper. These results imply that objects that are about to be named may undergo far-reaching processing, including access to their names, prior to fixation.
Similar articles
-
Parallel processing of objects in a naming task.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):982-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.982. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18605882
-
The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):523-37. doi: 10.1037/a0018522. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20192547
-
Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16478336
-
Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1742-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0150-6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21607814
-
Age of acquisition effects on an object-name verification task.Br J Psychol. 2006 Feb;97(Pt 1):1-18. doi: 10.1348/000712605X53515. Br J Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16464284
Cited by
-
Speakers gaze at objects while preparing intentionally inaccurate labels for them.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):943-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.943. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16822160 Free PMC article.
-
Observing the what and when of language production for different age groups by monitoring speakers' eye movements.Brain Lang. 2006 Dec;99(3):272-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Nov 10. Brain Lang. 2006. PMID: 16290041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of scene context on parafoveal processing of objects.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jan;71(1):229-240. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310263. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018. PMID: 28429648 Free PMC article.
-
Extrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: evidence from word probe experiments.Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):561-5. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.561. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008. PMID: 18567255
-
Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):365-74. doi: 10.1037/a0028646. Epub 2012 May 21. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 22612163 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources