How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations
- PMID: 15910310
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02561.x
How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations
Abstract
Estimating the genetic basis of phenotypic traits and the selection pressures acting on them are central to our understanding of the evolution and conservation of wild populations. However, obtaining such evolutionary-related parameters is not an easy task as it requires accurate information on both relatedness among individuals and their breeding success. Polymorphic molecular markers are very useful in estimating relatedness between individuals and parentage analyses are now extensively used in most taxa. The next step in the application of molecular data to wild populations is to use them to derive estimates of evolutionary-related parameters for quantitative traits, such as quantitative genetic parameters (e.g. heritability, genetic correlations) and measures of selection (e.g. selection gradients). Despite their great appeal and potential, the optimal use of molecular tools is still debated and it remains unclear how they should best be used to obtain reliable estimates of evolutionary parameters in the wild. Here, we review the methods available for estimating quantitative genetic and selection parameters and discuss their merits and shortcomings, to provide a tool that summarizes the potential uses of molecular data to obtain such parameters in wild populations.
Similar articles
-
Intra-population comparison of vegetative and floral trait heritabilities estimated from molecular markers in wild Aquilegia populations.Mol Ecol. 2011 Sep;20(17):3513-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05094.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20. Mol Ecol. 2011. PMID: 21504491
-
Evolutionary potential of a large marine vertebrate: quantitative genetic parameters in a wild population.Evolution. 2009 Apr;63(4):1051-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00605.x. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Evolution. 2009. PMID: 19236474
-
Molecular ecological approaches to studying the evolutionary impact of selective harvesting in wildlife.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):221-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03414.x. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 18173501 Review.
-
Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics.Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(4):883-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02809.x. Mol Ecol. 2006. PMID: 16599954 Review.
-
Strong artificial selection in the wild results in predicted small evolutionary change.J Evol Biol. 2007 Sep;20(5):1823-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01379.x. J Evol Biol. 2007. PMID: 17714300
Cited by
-
Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection.Genetics. 2007 Jan;175(1):277-88. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062711. Epub 2006 Nov 16. Genetics. 2007. PMID: 17110494 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of intra-specific variation in basal metabolic rate.J Comp Physiol B. 2013 Jan;183(1):27-41. doi: 10.1007/s00360-012-0698-z. Epub 2012 Jul 31. J Comp Physiol B. 2013. PMID: 22847501 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genomic selection on breeding time in a wild bird population.Evol Lett. 2019 Mar 5;3(2):142-151. doi: 10.1002/evl3.103. eCollection 2019 Apr. Evol Lett. 2019. PMID: 31289689 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches.Mol Ecol. 2014 Jul;23(14):3434-51. doi: 10.1111/mec.12827. Epub 2014 Jun 26. Mol Ecol. 2014. PMID: 24917482 Free PMC article.
-
Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.Genetics. 2009 Apr;181(4):1579-94. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.100214. Epub 2009 Feb 16. Genetics. 2009. PMID: 19221199 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources