Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search
- PMID: 15912874
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03195014
Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search
Abstract
In four experiments, we examined selection processes in visual search using a probe detection task to measure the allocation of attention. Under preview search conditions, probes were harder to detect on old relative to new distractors (Experiment 1). This cannot be attributed solely to low-level sensory factors (Experiment 2). In addition, probe detection was sensitive to color-based grouping of old distractors and to color similarity between old distractors (Experiments 3 and 4). These effects were dissociated when the color of the old distractors changed but probe detection effects remained. Collectively, the data indicate both group-based suppression of distractors and the separate inhibition of distractor features in search.
Similar articles
-
Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1007-16. doi: 10.1037/a0023505. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011. PMID: 21553995
-
No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.Vision Res. 2007 May;47(11):1464-78. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.027. Epub 2007 Apr 12. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17433399 Clinical Trial.
-
Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.Percept Psychophys. 2003 Feb;65(2):213-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03194796. Percept Psychophys. 2003. PMID: 12713240 Clinical Trial.
-
Fast color grouping and slow color inhibition: evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):503-17. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.503. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007. PMID: 17563218
-
History matters: the preview benefit in search is not onset capture.Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):181-5. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01439. Psychol Sci. 2003. PMID: 12661682
Cited by
-
Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 9;3:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00278. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22908002 Free PMC article.
-
Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:155-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.076. Epub 2010 Aug 31. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20807513 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):866-877. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000194. Epub 2016 Jan 11. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016. PMID: 26752732 Free PMC article.
-
Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):852-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03194111. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007. PMID: 18087949
-
Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.J Neurosci. 2018 May 16;38(20):4738-4748. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2407-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 24. J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29691330 Free PMC article.