Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;95(6):1016-23.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058164.

Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002-2003

Thomas R Frieden  1 , Farzad Mostashari, Bonnie D Kerker, Nancy Miller, Anjum Hajat, Martin Frankel
Affiliations

Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002-2003

Thomas R Frieden et al. Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to determine the impact of comprehensive tobacco control measures in New York City.

Methods: In 2002, New York City implemented a tobacco control strategy of (1) increased cigarette excise taxes; (2) legal action that made virtually all work-places, including bars and restaurants, smoke free; (3) increased cessation services, including a large-scale free nicotine-patch program; (4) education; and (5) evaluation. The health department also began annual surveys on a broad array of health measures, including smoking.

Results: From 2002 to 2003, smoking prevalence among New York City adults decreased by 11% (from 21.6% to 19.2%, approximately 140000 fewer smokers). Smoking declined among all age groups, race/ethnicities, and education levels; in both genders; among both US-born and foreign-born persons; and in all 5 boroughs. Increased taxation appeared to account for the largest proportion of the decrease; however, between 2002 and 2003 the proportion of cigarettes purchased outside New York City doubled, reducing the effective price increase by a third.

Conclusions: Concerted local action can sharply reduce smoking prevalence. However, further progress will require national action, particularly to increase cigarette taxes, reduce cigarette tax evasion, expand education and cessation services, and limit tobacco marketing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Smoking prevalence among New York City adults, 1993–2003, with key tobacco control initiatives and dates of implementation. Note. Smoking prevalence among adults decreased by 11%. Width of bars is proportional to sample size. Space between bars is proportional to time interval between surveys.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Odds ratios for smoking in 2003 vs 2002, by sociodemographic group, with 95% confidence intervals. Note. Logarithmic scale. All data are age adjusted (except for age).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs—United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2002;51:300–303. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking-attributable morbidity—United States, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2003;52:842–844. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health. Smoking prevalence among US adults. July 2002. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/research_data/adults_prev/prevali.htm. Accessed January 4, 2005.
    1. New York State Department of Health. Tobacco Use, Cessation, and Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke Among New York State Adults: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health; 2003. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/tobacco/reports/brfss2001.htm. Accessed January 4, 2005.
    1. Biener L, Aseltine RH Jr, Cohen B, Anderka M. Reactions of adult and teenaged smokers to the Massachusetts tobacco tax. Am J Public Health.1998;88:1389–1391. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms