Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Jan-Mar;8(1):89-103.
doi: 10.1007/BF00119297.

Limitations of the scrape-loading/dye transfer technique to quantify inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Limitations of the scrape-loading/dye transfer technique to quantify inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication

S C McKarns et al. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1992 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) is recognized as playing an important role in normal cell proliferation and development. Chemically induced alteration of GJIC has been proposed to be associated with abnormal cellular growth and/or tumor promotion. Several in vitro assays are currently used to determine the effects of chemicals on GJIC between cultured mammalian cells. One of these assays, the scrape-loading dye transfer (SL/DT) technique, is based on monitoring the transfer of the fluorescent dye Lucifer yellow from one cell into adjacent cells via functional gap junctions. The objective of our study was to evaluate and compare various approaches for quantifying results obtained with the SL/DT technique. Confluent cultures of either WB rat liver epithelial cells or LC-540 rat leydig cells were exposed to the animal tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), solvent (0.1% ethanol), or culture medium for one hour at 37 degrees C prior to analysis of GJIC. Inhibition of dye transfer was clearly evident following TPA exposure. Quantification of this dye transfer was assessed via four approaches: manually counting the number of labeled cells; measuring the distance of dye travel from the scrape line; quantifying the amount of cellular dye uptake; and determining the distribution of dye away from the scrape line. Our results suggest that while the SL/DT technique can be effectively used as a tool to determine the qualitative presence or absence of GJIC, its use in quantifying changes in GJIC following chemical exposure is limited. Since concentration-dependent responses are critical in chemical testing, application of the SL/DT method should be restricted to a screening assay for qualitatively assessing the presence or absence of GJIC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1089-91 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1978 Jul;14(3):741-59 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1984 Sep;154(1):38-52 - PubMed
    1. Carcinogenesis. 1981;2(3):243-9 - PubMed
    1. Physiol Rev. 1981 Oct;61(4):829-913 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources