Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Apr 22;1(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-1-3.

Learning spatial orientation tasks in the radial-maze and structural variation in the hippocampus in inbred mice

Affiliations

Learning spatial orientation tasks in the radial-maze and structural variation in the hippocampus in inbred mice

Wim E Crusio et al. Behav Brain Funct. .

Abstract

In the present paper we review a series of experiments showing that heritable variations in the size of the hippocampal intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber (IIPMF) terminal fields correlate with performance in spatial, but not non-spatial radial-maze tasks. Experimental manipulation of the size of this projection by means of early postnatal hyperthyroidism produces the effects predicted from the correlations obtained with inbred mouse strains. Although the physiological mechanisms behind these correlations are unknown as yet, several lines of evidence indicate that these correlations are causal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radial maze for use with mice. Plexiglas doors can be lowered to limit access to all arms simultaneously. From Crusio, 1999 [4], with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of a Timm-stained cross-section of the hippocampus. The hippocampal subregion CA3-CA4 (the area of morphometry) is indicated in black, stippled and hatched areas. Black areas: suprapyramidal (SP), intra- and infrapyramidal (IIP) and hilar (CA4) mossy fiber terminal fields originating from the dentate gyrus. Stippled area: strata oriens (OR) and radiatum (RD). Hatched area: stratum lacunosum-moleculare (LM). CA1, subregion of the hippocampus without mossy fibers; FI, fimbria hippocampi; FD, fascia dentata; OL and ML, outer and middle molecular layers of the fascia dentata; SG, supragranular layer; GC, granular cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Means ± SEM of the sizes of the hippocampal intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber projection (IIPMF) and the numbers of errors committed in a simple radial-maze task, with free access to arms and all 8 arms containing a food reward, each dot representing the mean of one inbred strain. Hippocampal data are based on 4 male mice per strain, behavioral data are from 3 males per strain. Data taken from Crusio et al., 1987 [11].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Means ± SEM of the sizes of the hippocampal intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber projection (IIPMF) and the numbers of errors committed in a simple radial-maze task, with subjects confined to the central platform for 5 sec. in between subsequent arm choices and all 8 arms containing a food reward. Each dot represents the mean of one inbred strain. n = 6 male mice per strain. Data taken from Schwegler et al., 1990 [23].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Means ± SEM of the sizes of the hippocampal intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber projection (IIPMF) and the numbers of working-memory (WM) and reference memory (RM) errors committed in an 8-arm radial maze with only 4 arms containing a food reward. Animals were tested during 10 days, one trial per day. Numvbers of errors shown are cumulative error counts on days 3–10. Upper panels: Spatial task. Lower panels: Non-spatial task. Left panels: Working-memory errors. Right panels: Reference memory errors. Note the different scales in the upper and lower panels, the non-spatial task obviously being much easier for the subjects.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Means ± SEM of the sizes of the hippocampal intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber projection (IIPMF) and the numbers of errors committed in a simple radial-maze task, with free access to arms and all 8 arms containing a food reward, each dot representing the mean of one inbred strain. Data taken from Figure 4 (8 strain means) and from Refs. [30-33] (10 additional strain means). For clarity, SEMs have been omitted.

References

    1. Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1984;11:47–60. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whishaw IQ. A comparison of rats and mice in a swimming pool place task and matching to place task: some surprising differences. Physiol Behav. 1995;58:687–693. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00110-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whishaw IQ, Tomie JA. Of mice and mazes: similarities between mice and rats on dry land but not water mazes. Physiol Behav. 1996;60:1191–1197. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00176-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crusio WE. Methodological considerations for testing learning in mice. In: Crusio WE, Gerlai RT, editor. Handbook of Molecular-Genetic Techniques for Brain and Behavior Research. Vol. 13. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 638–651.
    1. Gerlai R. Ethological approaches in behavioral neurogenetic research. In: Crusio WE, Gerlai RT, editor. Handbook of Molecular-Genetic Techniques for Brain and Behavior Research. Vol. 13. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 605–613.

LinkOut - more resources