Effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks on heart rate, thermal stress and subjective sensations

Abstract

Aim: The study was aimed at investigating the effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks with and without nano-functional treatments on thermophysiological responses and the subjective perception of discomfort.

Method: Five healthy male and five healthy female participants performed intermittent exercise on a treadmill while wearing the protective facemasks in a climate chamber controlled at an air temperature of 25 degrees C and a relative humidity of 70%. Four types of facemasks, including N95 (3M 8210) and surgical facemasks, which were treated with nano-functional materials, were used in the study.

Results: (1) The subjects had significantly lower average heart rates when wearing nano-treated and untreated surgical facemasks than when wearing nano-treated and untreated N95 facemasks. (2) The outer surface temperature of both surgical facemasks was significantly higher than that of both N95 facemasks. On the other hand, the microclimate and skin temperatures inside the facemask were significantly lower than those in both N95 facemasks. (3) Both surgical facemasks had significantly higher absolute humidity outside the surface than both N95 facemasks. The absolute humidity inside the surgical facemask was significantly lower than that inside both N95 facemasks. (4) Both surgical facemasks were rated significantly lower for perception of humidity, heat, breath resistance and overall discomfort than both N95 facemasks. The ratings for other sensations, including feeling unfit, tight, itchy, fatigued, odorous and salty, that were obtained while the subjects were wearing the surgical facemasks were significantly lower than when the subjects were wearing the N95 facemasks. (5) Subjective preference for the nano-treated surgical facemasks was the highest. There was significant differences in preference between the nano-treated and untreated surgical facemasks and between the surgical and N95 facemasks.

Discussion: We discuss how N95 and surgical facemasks induce significantly different temperature and humidity in the microclimates of the facemasks, which have profound influences on heart rate and thermal stress and subjective perception of discomfort.

Fig. 1

Temporal changes in mean heart rate under the influence of the four kinds of facemasks. Open circles N95 facemask; closed circles nano-treated N95 facemask; open squares surgical facemask; closed squares nano-treated surgical facemask

Fig. 2

Temporal change in mean temperature on the outer surface of the facemasks (top) and in the microclimate of the facemasks (bottom) under the influence of the four kinds of facemasks. Open circles N95 facemask; closed circles nano-treated N95 facemask; open squares surgical facemask; closed squares nano-treated surgical facemask

Fig. 3

Temporal changes in mean absolute humidity outside (top) and inside (bottom) the four kinds of facemasks. Open circles N95 facemask; closed circles nano-treated N95 facemask; open squares surgical facemask; closed squares nano-treated surgical facemask

Fig. 4

Subjective ratings for various sensations under the influence of the four kinds of facemasks: a humidity, b heat, c breath resistance, d overall discomfort. Open circles N95 facemask; closed circles nano-treated N95 facemask; open squares surgical facemask; closed squares nano-treated surgical facemask

Fig. 5

Others sensations under the influence of the four kinds of facemasks: feeling unfit, tight, itchy, fatigued, odorous and salty. Open circles N95 facemask; closed circles nano-treated N95 facemask; open squares surgical facemask; closed squares nano-treated surgical facemask

Fig. 6

Subjective preferences for the four kinds of facemasks