Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 May;8(3):266-74.
doi: 10.1079/phn2004691.

A concise overview of national nutrition action plans in the European Union Member States

Affiliations
Free article
Review

A concise overview of national nutrition action plans in the European Union Member States

Carl Lachat et al. Public Health Nutr. 2005 May.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: This study presents an overview of national nutrition action plans in the member states of the European Union (EU), before its enlargement in 2004. In addition, their compliance with key recommendations of the World Health Organization, as documented in the First Action Plan for Food and Nutrition Policy and the Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, has tentatively been evaluated on the basis of the policy documents published.

Design: Literature review of publicly available policy national plans on nutrition and physical activity.

Setting: Member states of the EU before enlargement in May 2004.

Results: The development of national nutrition action plans is gaining momentum. Six of the 15 EU member states - namely, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, France, The Netherlands and the UK - have an operational nutrition policy and four of them have published an elaborated description of their nutrition policy in English. By the end of 2004, another four countries are expected to have their plan finalised. The available nutrition action plans generally seem to comply with international recommendations, although large variations are observed between the member states in terms of terminology, nutritional recommendations, institutional framework, nutritional scope, social groups targeted and monitoring and evaluation structures.

Conclusions: Although the importance of nutritional surveillance, a comprehensive approach to nutritional problems and stakeholder involvement is recognised by the action plans, the justification for it is vaguely described. This paper advocates for proper evaluation and documentation of interventions in public health nutrition and nutrition policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources