Patient reports of satisfaction after microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia
- PMID: 15918947
- DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000159883.35957.e0
Patient reports of satisfaction after microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia
Abstract
Objective: There are no reports of patient satisfaction surveys after either a microvascular decompression (MVD) or a partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) for trigeminal neuralgia. This study compares patient satisfaction after these two types of posterior fossa surgery for trigeminal neuralgia, because it is postulated that recurrences, complications, and previous surgical experience reduce satisfaction.
Methods: All patients who had undergone their first posterior fossa surgery at one center were sent a self-complete questionnaire by an independent physician. Among the 44 questions on four standardized questionnaires were 5 questions that related to patient satisfaction and experience of obtaining care. Patients were divided into those having their first surgical procedure (primary) and those who had had previous ablative surgery (nonprimary).
Results: Response rates were 90% (220 of 245) of MVD and 88% (53 of 60) of PSR patients. Groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, duration of symptoms, mean duration of follow-up, and recurrence rates. Overall satisfaction with their current situation was 89% in MVD and 72% in PSR patients. Unsatisfied with the outcome were 4% of MVD and 20% of PSR patients, and this is a significant difference (P < 0.01). Satisfaction with outcome was higher in those undergoing this as a primary procedure. In the primary group, satisfaction was dependent on recurrence and complication/side effects status (each P < 0.01), but this was not the case in the nonprimary group. Patients expressed a desire for earlier posterior fossa surgery in 73% of MVD and 58% of PSR patients, and this was highest in the primary group. The final outcome was considered to be better than expected in 80% of MVD and 54% of PSR patients, but 22% of the PSR group (P < 0.01) thought they were worse off.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing posterior fossa surgery as a primary procedure are most satisfied and PSR patients are least satisfied, partly because of a higher rate of side effects.
Comment in
-
Patient reports of satisfaction after microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.Neurosurgery. 2006 Apr;58(4):E799; author reply E799. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200604000-00037. Neurosurgery. 2006. PMID: 16575313 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of pain and postoperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures 5 years after microvascular decompression or partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jan;160(1):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3350-6. Epub 2017 Oct 28. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018. PMID: 29080911 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Prognostic Value of Partial Sensory Rhizotomy and Microvascular Decompression for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparative Study.Med Sci Monit. 2017 May 15;23:2284-2291. doi: 10.12659/msm.901510. Med Sci Monit. 2017. PMID: 28502974 Free PMC article.
-
Posterior fossa exploration in treatment of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis.Surg Neurol. 2009 Apr;71(4):419-23; discussion 423. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.04.033. Epub 2008 Jul 9. Surg Neurol. 2009. PMID: 18614214
-
Trigeminal neuralgia. Non-invasive techniques versus microvascular decompression. It is really available any further improvement?Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;101:27-33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-78205-7_5. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008. PMID: 18642630 Review.
-
Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy.Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1997 Jan;8(1):31-9. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1997. PMID: 9018703 Review.
Cited by
-
Trigeminal neuralgia and its management.BMJ. 2007 Jan 27;334(7586):201-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39085.614792.BE. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17255614 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Automated Segmentation of Trigeminal Nerve and Cerebrovasculature in MR-Angiography Images by Deep Learning.Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 10;15:744967. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.744967. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34955711 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of pain and postoperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures 5 years after microvascular decompression or partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jan;160(1):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3350-6. Epub 2017 Oct 28. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018. PMID: 29080911 Free PMC article.
-
Trigeminal neuralgia: Assessment of neurovascular decompression by 3D fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition and 3D time of flight multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition magnetic resonance imaging.Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:50. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.96073. Epub 2012 May 14. Surg Neurol Int. 2012. PMID: 22629487 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of microvascular decompression on quality-of-life in trigeminal neuralgia patients aged 70 years and older.Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Feb 3;14:41. doi: 10.25259/SNI_997_2022. eCollection 2023. Surg Neurol Int. 2023. PMID: 36895226 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical