Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated
- PMID: 1591969
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00156574
Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated
Abstract
The effects of check size and stimulus size were investigated to optimize the steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from pattern-reversal stimulation of the visual field quadrants. Check sizes of 15', 30', 60', 90', 120' and 180' were investigated at a pattern reversal rate of 11.6 per second for field sizes varying from 2 degrees x 2 degrees to 24 degrees x 24 degrees. The visual evoked cortical potentials were recorded from mid occipital, right occipital and left occipital positions. In the inferonasal quadrant, the largest amplitudes were obtained with 30' and 60' check sizes; however, for these check sizes, the visual evoked cortical potential yielded limited additional information for field sizes greater than 4 degrees x 4 degrees and 6 degrees x 6 degrees, respectively. When a field size of 12 degrees x 12 degrees was investigated, a 90' check size was optimal. The results indicated that, with the above recording positions and check sizes of 15' to 120', there is an optimal number of pattern elements, 40 to 100, for stimulation of the inferonasal quadrant. This should be taken into account when a check size is selected to investigate a field quadrant of a particular size. Digital signal processing techniques were applied to analyze the visual evoked cortical potential, and the system shows promise for objective examination of the visual field.
Similar articles
-
Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata.Doc Ophthalmol. 1993;83(2):139-49. doi: 10.1007/BF01206212. Doc Ophthalmol. 1993. PMID: 8334929
-
Optimal check size and reversal rate to elicit pattern-reversal MEG responses.Can J Neurol Sci. 2005 May;32(2):218-24. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100004005. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005. PMID: 16018158
-
Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern-reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials.Doc Ophthalmol. 1997-1998;94(4):307-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02580856. Doc Ophthalmol. 1997. PMID: 9858091
-
Cortical potentials evoked by a TV pattern reversal stimulus with varying check sizes and stimulus field.Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;62(4):216-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.216. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978. PMID: 646979 Free PMC article.
-
The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.J Vis. 2015;15(6):4. doi: 10.1167/15.6.4. J Vis. 2015. PMID: 26024451 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.Eye (Lond). 2021 Sep;35(9):2354-2373. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01680-1. Epub 2021 Jul 16. Eye (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34272512 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A personal computer-based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system.Doc Ophthalmol. 1994;86(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01224630. Doc Ophthalmol. 1994. PMID: 7956688
-
Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials.Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr;80(4):297-303. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.4.297. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996. PMID: 8703877 Free PMC article.