Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;79(12):7845-51.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7845-7851.2005.

Modified vaccinia virus Ankara protects macaques against respiratory challenge with monkeypox virus

Affiliations

Modified vaccinia virus Ankara protects macaques against respiratory challenge with monkeypox virus

Koert J Stittelaar et al. J Virol. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

The use of classical smallpox vaccines based on vaccinia virus (VV) is associated with severe complications in both naive and immune individuals. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), a highly attenuated replication-deficient strain of VV, has been proven to be safe in humans and immunocompromised animals, and its efficacy against smallpox is currently being addressed. Here we directly compare the efficacies of MVA alone and in combination with classical VV-based vaccines in a cynomolgus macaque monkeypox model. The MVA-based smallpox vaccine protected macaques against a lethal respiratory challenge with monkeypox virus and is therefore an important candidate for the protection of humans against smallpox.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Experimental design. Each group consisted of six adult cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). For group I animals, MVA-BN (108 PFU) was administered by s.c. injection on days −28 and 0; for group II animals, an MVA-BN primer dose (2 × 106 PFU) was administered by s.c. injection on day −10 and Elstree-RIVM was administered i.c. with a bifurcated needle on day 0; for group III animals, Elstree-RIVM was administered i.c. with a bifurcated needle on day 0; for group IV, Elstree-BN was administered i.c. with a bifurcated needle on day 0; and group V consisted of nonvaccinated animals. Fifteen weeks after the (last) vaccination, all animals were challenged i.t. with MPXV strain MSF#6 in the trachea by intubation.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Reactivities and immunogenicities of different smallpox vaccines. (a) Sizes (areas) of vaccine-induced pocks measured on day 7 at the site of s.c. inoculation of MVA (groups I and II) or i.c. inoculation of Estree-RIVM (groups II and III) or Elstree-BN (group IV). (b, left side) Induction of MVA-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells, as measured by an ELISPOT assay. PBMC were isolated before vaccination, 4 and 9 weeks after the (last) vaccination, and at the moment of challenge (week 15). The data are expressed as the average numbers of specific IFN-γ-secreting cells in 300,000 PBMC per group ± SD. (b, right side) Induction of MVA-specific lymphoproliferation, as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting after a BrdU incorporation assay. PBMC were isolated before vaccination and 3 weeks after the (last) vaccination. The data are expressed as the average SI per group ± SD. (c) Development of specific plasma IgG responses in samples collected on different days after vaccination, as measured by ELISA. The data are expressed as average titers per group ± SD. (d) Vaccinia virus-specific neutralizing plasma antibody titers in samples collected on different days after vaccination, as measured by a plaque reduction assay. The moments of vaccination are indicated with the respective symbols. The data are expressed as average 50% plaque reduction titers (PRNT) per group ± SD.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Body temperature profiles after respiratory inoculation with 106 (a) or 107 (b) PFU of MPXV strain MSF#6. The macaques were not vaccinated or had been vaccinated with two doses of MVA-BN, one low dose of MVA-BN followed by Elstree-RIVM, Elstree-RIVM alone, or Elstree-BN. Each macaque had an active temperature transponder in its peritoneal cavity. The animals exhibited differences in their baseline temperatures (37.7 ± 0.9°C) and slight shifts in their day-night temperature cycles. Therefore, the data are expressed as percentages of the average temperature change per day per group with (upper limit) 95% confidence intervals. The dotted line denotes a 1°C temperature increase above the average baseline.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Histological lesions and ultrastructural detection of MPXV in lung and skin of a nonvaccinated macaque. (a) Edge of typical cutaneous lesion characterized by epidermal hyperplasia, orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis, ballooning degeneration of keratinocytes (arrowhead) with necrosis, and infiltration by inflammatory cells towards the center (arrow). (b) Necrosis of pulmonary alveolar wall, indicated with arrowheads, and flooding of alveolar lumen with fibrin, edema fluid, foamy macrophages, degenerative neutrophils, and necrotic cellular debris. (c) Mature (arrowhead) and immature poxvirus particles in keratinocyte. Bar, 5,000 nm. (d) Poxvirus particles in necrotic alveolar wall. Bar, 5,000 nm. (Inset) Higher magnification of mature poxvirus particle with characteristic dumbbell structure of the core (left) and immature poxvirus particle (right). Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (a and b) or with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (c and d). Original magnification, ×10 (a) or ×40 (b).
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Monkeypox viral loads in plasmas and throat swabs from vaccinated and control animals at different time points after respiratory inoculation with 106 PFU (left graphs) or 107 PFU of MPXV (right graphs). The data are expressed as average log10 values per group plus SD. (a) Viral loads in throat swabs, as measured by real-time quantitative PCR; (b) plasma viremia, as measured by real-time quantitative PCR; (c) viral loads in throat swabs, as measured by quantitative virus isolation in Vero cell monolayers. †, natural death; X, euthanasia. (d) AUCs of the viral loads in plasmas and throat swabs from vaccinated and control animals over a 28-day follow-up after respiratory inoculation with 106 PFU (left graph) or 107 PFU of MPXV (right graph). The data are expressed as average log10 values per group plus SD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amorosa, V. K., and S. N. Isaacs. 2003. Separate worlds set to collide: smallpox, vaccinia virus vaccination, and human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 37:426-432. - PubMed
    1. Bray, M., and M. E. Wright. 2003. Progressive vaccinia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:766-774. - PubMed
    1. Breman, J. G., and I. Arita. 1980. The confirmation and maintenance of smallpox eradication. N. Engl. J. Med. 303:1263-1273. - PubMed
    1. Drexler, I., K. Heller, B. Wahren, V. Erfle, and G. Sutter. 1998. Highly attenuated modified vaccinia virus Ankara replicates in baby hamster kidney cells, a potential host for virus propagation, but not in various human transformed and primary cells. J. Gen. Virol. 79:347-352. - PubMed
    1. Earl, P. L., J. L. Americo, L. S. Wyatt, L. A. Eller, J. C. Whitbeck, G. H. Cohen, R. J. Eisenberg, C. J. Hartmann, D. L. Jackson, D. A. Kulesh, M. J. Martinez, D. M. Miller, E. M. Mucker, J. D. Shamblin, S. H. Zwiers, J. W. Huggins, P. B. Jahrling, and B. Moss. 2004. Immunogenicity of a highly attenuated MVA smallpox vaccine and protection against monkeypox. Nature 428:182-185. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms