Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 15920400
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000162138.36519.2a
Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: To compare the test performance of plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) in the detection of patients with cervical spine injuries following blunt traumatic events among those patients determined to require screening radiography.
Methods: We conducted a MEDLINE search for articles published from January 1995 through June 2004, manually reviewed bibliographies, and hand searched four journals. Studies were included if they contained data on the performance of both plain radiography and CT in the detection of patients with blunt cervical spine injuries. Both authors screened titles and abstracts identified by the search and seven of the 712 articles met all inclusion criteria. Both authors independently abstracted data from these seven studies and disagreements were resolved by mutual agreement.
Results: Patient entry criteria were highly variable for each study and there were no randomized controlled trials. For identifying patients with cervical spine injury, the pooled sensitivity for cervical spine plain radiography was 52% (95% CI 47, 56%) and for CT was 98% (95% CI 96, 99%). The test for heterogeneity suggests that significant differences exist between studies in the measurement of the sensitivity for plain radiography (p = 0.07). Due to limitations of the gold standard tests in each study, a calculation of a combined specificity was not possible.
Conclusion: Despite the absence of a randomized controlled trial, ample evidence exists that CT significantly outperforms plain radiography as a screening test for patients at very high risk of cervical spine injury and thus CT should be the initial screening test in those patients with a significantly depressed mental status. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that cervical spine CT should replace plain radiography as the initial screening test for less injured patients who are at low risk for cervical spine injury but still require a screening radiographic examination.
Similar articles
-
The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma.J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1121-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000188632.79060.ba. J Trauma. 2005. PMID: 16385289
-
Cervical spine trauma - Evaluating the diagnostic power of CT, MRI, X-Ray and LODOX.Injury. 2023 Jul;54(7):110771. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 6. Injury. 2023. PMID: 37164902
-
Sensitivity of plain radiography for pediatric cervical spine injury.Emerg Radiol. 2016 Oct;23(5):443-8. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1417-y. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Emerg Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27321014
-
Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults?J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.094. Epub 2013 Dec 14. J Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24342907 Review.
-
Safe cervical spine clearance in adult obtunded blunt trauma patients on the basis of a normal multidetector CT scan--a meta-analysis and cohort study.Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 12. Injury. 2013. PMID: 23856632 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinics in diagnostic imaging (214).Singapore Med J. 2022 Sep;63(9):527-534. doi: 10.4103/SINGAPOREMEDJ.SMJ-2021-306. Epub 2022 Oct 28. Singapore Med J. 2022. PMID: 36367031 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Occult Disco-Ligamentous Lesions of the Subaxial c-Spine-A Comparison of Preoperative Imaging Findings and Intraoperative Site Inspection.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):447. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030447. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33807826 Free PMC article.
-
Misdiagnosed bilateral C5-C6 dislocation causing cervical spine instability: a case report.Cases J. 2009 Jul 14;2:6149. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-6149. Cases J. 2009. PMID: 19829768 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic utility of point of care ultrasound in identifying cervical spine injury in emergency settings.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Jul 2;24(4):208-216. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12274. eCollection 2021 Nov. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021. PMID: 34888130 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of acute cervical spine imaging based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria®.Emerg Radiol. 2012 Jan;19(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-0994-z. Epub 2011 Nov 6. Emerg Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22057542
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous