Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul;19(7):996-1001.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2206-3. Epub 2005 May 19.

Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Affiliations

Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

A de Vries et al. Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Preceding endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in patients with choledochocystolithiasis impedes laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and increases risk of conversion. We studied the influence of time interval between ERC and LC on the course of LC.

Methods: All patients treated for choledochocystolithiasis with ERC and LC during 1996-2001 were studied retrospectively, comparing the course of LC in three time interval groups; LC < 2, 2-6, and > 6 weeks after ERC.

Primary outcomes: adhesions, bile duct injury, operating time, and conversion-rate.

Results: Eighty-three patients were studied (group 1, n = 23; group 2, n = 15; group 3, n = 45). Adhesions, operation time, and bile duct damage did not significantly differ between the groups. The conversion rate in group 2 is significantly higher compared to group 1 (p = 0.027, OR 11 (1.13-106.8)) CONCLUSIONS: A higher conversion rate of LC is found 2-6 weeks after ERC compared to LC within 2 weeks. However, further research is needed to gain more reliable data on whether this is caused by timing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gut. 1995 Jul;37(1):119-20 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1998 Jan 17;351(9097):159-61 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2003 Mar;27(3):256-9 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1996 Dec;10(12):1124 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2003 Feb;27(2):180-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources