Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul;69(3):353-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.08.004. Epub 2004 Nov 21.

Alcoholism is a disinhibitory disorder: neurophysiological evidence from a Go/No-Go task

Chella Kamarajan  1 , Bernice Porjesz, Kevin A Jones, Keewhan Choi, David B Chorlian, Ajayan Padmanabhapillai, Madhavi Rangaswamy, Arthur T Stimus, Henri Begleiter
Affiliations

Alcoholism is a disinhibitory disorder: neurophysiological evidence from a Go/No-Go task

Chella Kamarajan et al. Biol Psychol. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Response inhibition is considered a core dimension in alcoholism and its co-existing disorders. The major objective of this study is to compare the magnitude and spatial distribution of ERP components during response activation and inhibition in alcoholics (N = 30) and normal controls (N = 30) using a visual Go/No-Go task. The results indicate that alcoholics manifest a decreased P3(00) amplitude during Go as well as No-Go conditions. The difference between Go and No-Go processing was more evident in controls than in alcoholics. The topography of current source density in alcoholics during the P3 response was found to be very different from that of normals, suggesting that alcoholics perhaps activated inappropriate brain circuitry during cognitive processing. The significantly reduced No-Go P3 along with the relatively less anteriorized CSD topography during No-Go condition suggests poor inhibitory control in alcoholics. It is proposed that the No-Go P3, the electrophysiological signature of response inhibition, can be considered as an endophenotypic marker in alcoholism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Regional grouping of electrodes: (1) Frontal, (2) Central, (3) Parietal, (4) Occipital, (5) Left-temporal, and (6) Right-temporal. The representative electrodes included for statistical analysis are highlighted.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ERP waveforms of control versus alcoholic groups during No-Go and Go condition.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The spatial distribution of ERP amplitudes (in μV) at three time intervals of the P3 component in control and alcoholic groups during No-Go and Go condition.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The spatial distribution of CSD (in μV/r2cm2, where r = head radius) at three time intervals of the P3 component in control and alcoholic groups during No-Go and Go conditions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Almasy L, Porjesz B, Blangero J, Chorlian DB, O’Connor SJ, Kuperman S, Rohrbaugh J, Bauer LO, Reich T, Polich J, Begleiter H. Heritability of event-related brain potentials in families with a history of alcoholism. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 1999a;88:383–390. - PubMed
    1. Anokhin AP, van Baal GC, van Beijsterveldt CE, de Geus EJ, Grant J, Boomsma DI. Genetic correlation between the P300 event-related brain potential and the EEG power spectrum. Behavior Genetics. 2001;31:545–554. - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121:65–94. - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA. The executive functions and self-regulation: an evolutionary neuropsychological perspective. Neuropsychology Review. 2001;11:1–29. - PubMed
    1. Bauer LO. CNS recovery from cocaine, cocaine and alcohol, or opioid dependence: a P300 study. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2001;112:1508–1515. - PubMed

Publication types