Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul;9(4):205-13.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-005-0614-8.

[Analysis of quality of life in patients with a facial prosthesis]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Analysis of quality of life in patients with a facial prosthesis]

[Article in German]
M Klein et al. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: This clinical study examined the quality of life of face-disabled patients who had received a facial prosthesis.

Patients and methods: The examination of the 58 patients was performed using different questionnaires. For the evaluation of the subjective health-related quality of life an instrument constructed by the WHO was used (WHOQOQL-Bref). The Frankfurter Scales of Body Concepts (FKKS) was chosen to measure the self-assessment of the patient's own body perception. For the assessment of the present general quality of life a visual analogue scale was used (Anamnestic Comparative Self-Assessment, ACSA). Additionally an ad hoc questionnaire was used, which registers the post-therapeutic epithetic rehabilitation. The health-related quality of life of this sample was compared to a healthy one of the normal population.

Results: The examinations showed that the quality of life of the patients is reduced in contrast to the healthy group when the acquired defects were located in the region of the eye and the nose. The evaluation of the scales of body concepts showed that the patient's own body image was significantly altered. Body contact with other persons and their own sexual attraction was perceived as remarkably diminished. The patients believed that they spread an unpleasant odor. It is surprising that the wearers of a facial prosthesis indicated that they did not notice a restriction in the acceptance of their body by others. The influence of the application of camouflage did not have an impact on the quality of life.

Conclusion: To improve the restricted quality of life, to the raise the reduced well-being and to strengthen the altered body experience, psychological care should be provided besides further optimization of the surgical-epithetic therapy and the camouflage technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Head Neck Surg. 1978 Sep-Oct;1(1):52-8 - PubMed
    1. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1999 Jun;214(6):391-4 - PubMed
    1. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;13(4):225-32 - PubMed
    1. Head Neck. 1999 Jan;21(1):1-11 - PubMed
    1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):225-45 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources