Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1413.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38450.646088.E0. Epub 2005 Jun 1.

Ultrasonography in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns: systematic review

Affiliations

Ultrasonography in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns: systematic review

Nerys F Woolacott et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy and effectiveness of the screening of all newborn infants for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using ultrasound imaging, as is standard practice in some European countries but not in the United Kingdom, the United States, or Scandinavia.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: Twenty three medical, economic, and grey literature databases (to March 2004), with no limitations of design or language; some references were provided by experts.

Selection of studies: Only diagnostic accuracy studies and comparative studies conducted in an unselected newborn population were eligible for the review. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and performed the quality assessment.

Results: The review identified one diagnostic accuracy study, and this was of limited quality. In this study the reference standard was treatment up to age of 8 months or an abnormal ultrasound finding at age 8 months. Ultrasound screening had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% confidence interval 84.1% to 92.1%), specificity of 96.7% (96.4% to 97.4%), a positive predictive value of 61.6% and a negative predictive value of 99.4%. Ten studies evaluated the impact of ultrasound in screening, but these too had various methodological weaknesses, limiting the reliability of their findings. Compared with clinical screening, general ultrasound screening in newborns may increase overall treatment rates, but ultrasound screening seems to be associated with shorter and less intrusive treatment.

Conclusions: Clear evidence is lacking either for or against general ultrasound screening of newborn infants for DDH. Studies that investigate the natural course of the disorder, the optimal treatment for DDH, and the best strategy for ultrasound screening are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kocher MS. Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: an epidemiologic analysis (part I). Am J Orthop 2000;29: 929-33. - PubMed
    1. Graf R. Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984;102: 248-55. - PubMed
    1. Harcke HT, Grissom LE. Performing dynamic sonography of the infant hip. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155: 837-44. - PubMed
    1. Terjesen T, Runden TO, Tangerud A. Ultrasonography and radiography of the hip in infants. Acta Orthop Scand 1989;60: 651-60. - PubMed
    1. Terjesen T. Ultrasound as the primary imaging method in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia in children aged < 2 years. J Pediatr Orthop B 1996;5: 123-8. - PubMed

Publication types