Pertussis in adolescents and adults: should we vaccinate?
- PMID: 15930232
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2509
Pertussis in adolescents and adults: should we vaccinate?
Abstract
Background: The incidence of reported pertussis among adolescents, adults, and young infants has increased sharply over the past decade. Combined acellular pertussis vaccines for adolescents and adults are available in Canada, Australia, and Germany and may soon be considered for use in the United States.
Objective: To evaluate the potential health benefits, risks, and costs of a national pertussis vaccination program for adolescents and/or adults.
Design, setting, and population: The projected health states and immunity levels associated with pertussis disease and vaccination were simulated with a Markov model. The following strategies were examined from the health care payer and societal perspectives: (1) no vaccination; (2) 1-time adolescent vaccination; (3) 1-time adult vaccination; (4) adult vaccination with boosters; (5) adolescent and adult vaccination with boosters; and (6) postpartum vaccination. Data on disease incidence, costs, outcomes, vaccine efficacy, and adverse events were based on published studies, recent unpublished clinical trials, and expert panel input.
Main outcome measures: Cases prevented, adverse events, costs (in 2004 US dollars), cost per case prevented, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved.
Results: One-time adolescent vaccination would prevent 30800 cases of pertussis (36% of projected cases) and would result in 91000 vaccine adverse events (67% local reactions). If pertussis vaccination cost $15 and vaccine coverage was 76%, then 1-time adolescent vaccination would cost $1100 per case prevented (or $1200 per case prevented) or $20000 per QALY (or $23000 per QALY) saved, from the societal (or health care payer) perspective. With a threshold of $50000 per QALY saved, the adolescent and adult vaccination with boosters strategy became potentially cost-effective from the societal perspective only if 2 conditions were met simultaneously, ie, (1) the disease incidence for adolescents and adults was > or =6 times higher than base-case assumptions and (2) the cost of vaccination was less than $10. Adult vaccination strategies were more costly and less effective than adolescent vaccination strategies. The results were sensitive to assumptions about disease incidence, vaccine efficacy, frequency of vaccine adverse events, and vaccine costs.
Conclusions: Routine pertussis vaccination of adolescents results in net health benefits and may be relatively cost-effective.
Comment in
-
Pertussis in adolescents and adults: should we accept the results?Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1263; author reply 1263-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1829. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 16264023 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in adults.Am J Prev Med. 2007 Mar;32(3):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.016. Am J Prev Med. 2007. PMID: 17296470
-
Economic evaluation of the 7-vaccine routine childhood immunization schedule in the United States, 2001.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Dec;159(12):1136-44. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1136. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005. PMID: 16330737
-
Cost-effectiveness of conjugate meningococcal vaccination strategies in the United States.Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1220-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2514. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15867028
-
Update on adolescent immunization: review of pertussis and the efficacy, safety, and clinical use of vaccines that contain tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis.J Pediatr Health Care. 2006 Jul-Aug;20(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.12.011. J Pediatr Health Care. 2006. PMID: 16831630 Review.
-
Prevention of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria among pregnant and postpartum women and their infants recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008 May 30;57(RR-4):1-51. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008. PMID: 18509304 Review.
Cited by
-
Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccines. Part I: A Systematic Review to Identify and Describe Studies About Quantitative Benefit-Risk Models Applied to Vaccines.Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;43(11):1089-1104. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00984-7. Drug Saf. 2020. PMID: 32914292 Free PMC article.
-
Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccines. Part II: Proposal Towards Consolidated Standards of Reporting Quantitative Benefit-Risk Models Applied to Vaccines (BRIVAC).Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;43(11):1105-1120. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00982-9. Drug Saf. 2020. PMID: 32918682 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of adolescent pertussis vaccination for the Netherlands: using an individual-based dynamic model.PLoS One. 2010 Oct 15;5(10):e13392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013392. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20976213 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of increasing vaccination in high-risk adults aged 18-64 Years: a model-based decision analysis.BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2967-2. BMC Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29370768 Free PMC article.
-
Tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine for prevention of pertussis among adults aged 19 years and older in the United States: A cost-effectiveness analysis.Prev Med. 2020 May;134:106066. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106066. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 32199910 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous