Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jul;48(6):307-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.03.009. Epub 2005 Apr 15.

[Evaluation of amputees]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Review

[Evaluation of amputees]

[Article in French]
I Loiret et al. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Review of the literature about evaluation of amputees.

Materials and methods: A search of the Medline and Reedoc databases with the key words lower limb amputee, upper limb amputee, evaluation of lower limb amputee, evaluation of upper limb amputee, survey of lower limb amputee, survey of upper limb and the same words in French for reports on the evaluation of amputees.

Results: Evaluations of amputees differ according to the level of amputation (lower or upper limb) and age (adult or child). They concern standing balance, walking (lower limb) and the mono- or bimanual prehensile capacities with or without prostheses in daily living activities and leisure (upper limb) as well as quality of life, personal satisfaction, psychological impact and, in particular, coping strategies.

Discussion: For lower-limb amputees, tools to evaluate include scales of deambulation, of which few are valid in French, and global scales (on locomotor capacities, quality of life and satisfaction), which have been recently validated, but only one of them is valid in French. For upper-limb amputees, specific and valid tools are not available for adults; however, for children some functional capacity scales in daily activities have been validated and take into account psychomotor development. None of these tools are valid in French, and their use is scattered and limited to validation studies.

Conclusion: Only a few tools to evaluate amputees are valid in French for adults, and they concern lower-limb amputees only. Validating some of these tools in French is necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources