Directional sensitivity of human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents to forces applied to the teeth
- PMID: 1593451
- PMCID: PMC1176041
- DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019007
Directional sensitivity of human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents to forces applied to the teeth
Abstract
1. Single-unit impulse activity from thirty-eight mechanoreceptive afferent fibres was recorded in the human inferior alveolar nerve using tungsten microelectrodes. All afferents responded to mechanical stimulation of the teeth and most likely supplied periodontal mechanoreceptors. 2. All afferents showed their highest sensitivity to forces applied to a particular tooth (the lower incisors, the canine or the first premolar). Forces with 'ramp-and-hold' shaped profiles of similar magnitudes were applied to that tooth in the following six directions: lingual, labial, mesial and distal in the horizontal plane, and up and down in the axial direction of the tooth. Both static and dynamic response components were analysed. 3. All afferents were 'slowly adapting' since they discharged continuously in response to static forces in at least one stimulation direction. Twenty-five afferents (66%) were spontaneously active in the sense that they showed an on-going discharge in the absence of external stimulation. 4. Diverse receptive fields were observed. Most afferents (74%) responded to static forces in two or three of the four horizontal directions. Likewise, all units showed excitatory responses to axial loading with a majority (74%) responding in one of the two axial directions and the remainder in both axial directions. Spontaneously active afferents generally decreased their discharge rate when stimulated in directions opposite to the directions exciting the afferent. With regard to population responses, approximately half of the afferents showed excitatory responses to each stimulus direction except for downwards, in which 86% responded. 5. Twenty-three afferents (61%) exhibited the strongest response to forces in one of the horizontal directions. Of those, a majority were most responsive to the lingual direction (52%) and some to the labial direction (30%). Accordingly, the discharge rates during force application averaged over the whole afferent sample were highest in these directions. Of the remaining afferents, most responsive to one of the axial directions, 60% showed their strongest responses to forces in the downward direction. 6. Forty-five per cent of the afferents showed wider receptive fields to the dynamic component of the force stimulation than to the static. The direction of maximal sensitivity, however, remained the same with few exceptions. 7. It was demonstrated that even though individual periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents provide ambiguous information regarding the direction of a force applied to a tooth, populations of such afferents are well suited to give detailed directional information. It is suggested that such information may play an important role for the control of mastication.
Similar articles
-
Receptive field properties of human periodontal afferents responding to loading of premolar and molar teeth.J Neurophysiol. 2003 Mar;89(3):1478-87. doi: 10.1152/jn.00537.2002. J Neurophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12626623
-
Multiple-tooth receptive fields of single human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents.J Neurophysiol. 1993 Feb;69(2):474-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.2.474. J Neurophysiol. 1993. PMID: 8459279
-
Encoding of amplitude and rate of forces applied to the teeth by human periodontal mechanoreceptive afferents.J Neurophysiol. 1994 Oct;72(4):1734-44. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.4.1734. J Neurophysiol. 1994. PMID: 7823098
-
Encoding of tooth loads by human periodontal afferents and their role in jaw motor control.Prog Neurobiol. 1996 Jun;49(3):267-84. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00016-0. Prog Neurobiol. 1996. PMID: 8878305 Review.
-
Orofacial mechanoreceptors in humans: encoding characteristics and responses during natural orofacial behaviors.Behav Brain Res. 2002 Sep 20;135(1-2):27-33. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00151-1. Behav Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 12356430 Review.
Cited by
-
Subjective and objective evaluation of masticatory function in patients with bimaxillary implant-supported prostheses.J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Feb;50(2):140-149. doi: 10.1111/joor.13393. Epub 2022 Dec 1. J Oral Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 36415039 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual distortion of face deletion by local anaesthesia of the human lips and teeth.Exp Brain Res. 2005 Aug;165(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2278-x. Epub 2005 Apr 8. Exp Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 15818498
-
Fine motor control of the jaw following alteration of orofacial afferent inputs.Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):613-626. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1939-4. Epub 2016 Aug 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2017. PMID: 27568306 Free PMC article.
-
Reflex responses of motor units in human masseter muscle to mechanical stimulation of a tooth.Exp Brain Res. 1994;100(2):307-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00227200. Exp Brain Res. 1994. PMID: 7813667
-
Effects of experimental craniofacial pain on fine jaw motor control: a placebo-controlled double-blinded study.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jun;233(6):1745-59. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4245-5. Epub 2015 Mar 19. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25788006 Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources