Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Mar;170(3):335-48.
doi: 10.1007/BF00191422.

Communication in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus. I. The neural basis of conspecific EOD detection

Affiliations

Communication in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus. I. The neural basis of conspecific EOD detection

L J Fleishman. J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Mar.

Abstract

There is a sexual dimorphism in the frequency of the quasi-sinusoidal electric organ discharge (EOD) of Sternopygus macrurus, with males, on average, an octave lower. EODs are detected by tuberous electroreceptor organs, which exhibit V-shaped frequency tuning with maximal sensitivity near the fish's own EOD frequency. This would seem to limit the ability of a fish to detect the EODs of opposite-sex conspecifics. However, electroreceptor tuning has always been based on single-frequency stimulation, while actual EOD detection involves the addition of a conspecific EOD to the fish's own. In the present study, recordings were made from single electroreceptive units while the fish were stimulated with pairs of sine waves: one (S1) representing the fish's own EOD added to a second (S2) representing a conspecific EOD. T unit response was easily predicted by assuming that the electroreceptor acts as a linear filter in series with a threshold-sensitive spike initiator. P unit response was more complex, and unexpectedly high sensitivity was found for frequencies of S2 well displaced from the fish's EOD frequency. For both P and T units, detection thresholds for S2 were much lower when added to S1, than when presented alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Aug;54(2):422-9 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Physiol A. 1987 Apr;160(4):491-500 - PubMed
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Jan;36(1):39-60 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Mar;170(3):349-56 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1984 Oct 1;228(4):557-70 - PubMed

Publication types