The great subjective back-referral debate: do neural responses increase during a train of stimuli?
- PMID: 15935698
- DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.001
The great subjective back-referral debate: do neural responses increase during a train of stimuli?
Abstract
Evidence is summarised for and against the hypothesis that potentiation or facilitation of neural responses during a train of threshold-level stimuli occurred in the experiments reported by . It is concluded that such potentiation probably did occur. Since the main arguments for the existence of subjective backwards referral () take it as given that such potentiation did not occur, it is further concluded that the main arguments for the existence of subjective backwards referral fail.
Similar articles
-
The timing of brain events: reply to the "Special Section" in this journal of September 2004, edited by Susan Pockett.Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.03.001. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Conscious Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16854596
-
Brain stimulation and conscious experience: electrical stimulation of the cortical surface at a threshold current evokes sustained neuronal activity only after a prolonged latency.Conscious Cogn. 2006 Sep;15(3):560-5. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.003. Epub 2005 Jun 2. Conscious Cogn. 2006. PMID: 15935700
-
Temporal nonlinearity during recovery from sequential inhibition by neurons in the cat primary auditory cortex.J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1897-907. doi: 10.1152/jn.00625.2005. Epub 2005 Dec 7. J Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16339004
-
[Pain and consciousness].Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 1986 Sep-Oct;40(5):604-11. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 1986. PMID: 3299338 Review. Polish. No abstract available.
-
Reflections on the interaction of the mind and brain.Prog Neurobiol. 2006 Feb-Apr;78(3-5):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 May 3. Prog Neurobiol. 2006. PMID: 16675090 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources