Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier
- PMID: 15935756
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.022
Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier
Abstract
Genomic rearrangements linked to aberrant recombination are associated with cancer and human genetic diseases. Such recombination has indirectly been linked to replication fork stalling. Using fission yeast, we have developed a genetic system to block replication forks at nonhistone/DNA complexes located at a specific euchromatic site. We demonstrate that stalled replication forks lead to elevated intrachromosomal and ectopic recombination promoting site-specific gross chromosomal rearrangements. We show that recombination is required to promote cell viability when forks are stalled, that recombination proteins associate with sites of fork stalling, and that recombination participates in deleterious site-specific chromosomal rearrangements. Thus, recombination is a "double-edged sword," preventing cell death when the replisome disassembles at the expense of genetic stability.
Comment in
-
Recombination at collapsed replication forks: the payoff for survival.Mol Cell. 2005 Jun 10;18(6):614-5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.018. Mol Cell. 2005. PMID: 15949436
Similar articles
-
Homologous recombination restarts blocked replication forks at the expense of genome rearrangements by template exchange.Mol Cell. 2010 Aug 13;39(3):346-59. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.015. Mol Cell. 2010. PMID: 20705238
-
Recombination occurs within minutes of replication blockage by RTS1 producing restarted forks that are prone to collapse.Elife. 2015 Mar 25;4:e04539. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04539. Elife. 2015. PMID: 25806683 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.J Cell Biol. 2005 Feb 14;168(4):537-44. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200410006. J Cell Biol. 2005. PMID: 15716375 Free PMC article.
-
Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?EMBO Rep. 2007 Apr;8(4):346-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400940. EMBO Rep. 2007. PMID: 17401409 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Assays to Study Mitotic Recombination Outcomes.Genes (Basel). 2020 Jan 10;11(1):79. doi: 10.3390/genes11010079. Genes (Basel). 2020. PMID: 31936815 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Approaching Protein Barriers: Emerging Mechanisms of Replication Pausing in Eukaryotes.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 May 28;9:672510. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.672510. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34124054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lsd1 and lsd2 control programmed replication fork pauses and imprinting in fission yeast.Cell Rep. 2012 Dec 27;2(6):1513-20. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Dec 20. Cell Rep. 2012. PMID: 23260662 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;26(4):1424-33. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1424-1433.2006. Mol Cell Biol. 2006. PMID: 16449653 Free PMC article.
-
Stable G-quadruplex DNA structures promote replication-dependent genome instability.J Biol Chem. 2022 Jun;298(6):101947. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101947. Epub 2022 Apr 18. J Biol Chem. 2022. PMID: 35447109 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast.EMBO J. 2006 Aug 9;25(15):3627-39. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601251. Epub 2006 Aug 3. EMBO J. 2006. PMID: 16888628 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources